Cottrell v. Biddle et al
Filing
18
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT. The Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 16 is ADOPTED in its entirety, Plaintiff's Motion, ECF No. 15 , is GRANTED and the Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The file is CLOSED. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice. (LLH, Courtroom Deputy) **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL** (Shawn Cottrell, Prisoner ID: 773803)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
6
7
SHAWN ALLEN COTTRELL,
NO: 2:16-CV-0234-TOR
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION AND
DISMISSING COMPLAINT
v.
LAURIE BIDDLE, GRADY
JACKSON and SHAUN DOUGLAS,
11
Defendants.
12
13
BEFORE THE COURT is Magistrate Judge Rodger’s Report and
14
Recommendation, ECF No. 16, to grant Plaintiff Shawn Allen Cottrell’s Motion to
15
Voluntarily Dismiss Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), ECF No. 15.
16
Defendants have not been served in this action.
17
There being no objections, IT IS ORDERED the Report and
18
Recommendation, ECF No. 16 is ADOPTED in its entirety, Plaintiff's Motion,
19
ECF No. 15, is GRANTED and the Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT
20
PREJUDICE.
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND
DISMISSING COMPLAINT --1
1
Although granted the opportunity to do so, Plaintiff did not file a separate
2
Motion and Affidavit to waive the remaining balance of the filing fee as directed.
3
Therefore, Plaintiff still is obliged to pay the full filing fee for this action pursuant
4
to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b).
5
IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Executive is directed to enter this
6
Order, enter judgment of dismissal without prejudice, forward a copy to Plaintiff,
7
and close the file.
8
DATED January 25, 2017.
9
10
THOMAS O. RICE
Chief United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND
DISMISSING COMPLAINT --2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?