Wells v. Bank of America NA et al

Filing 13

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Granting 12 Parties' MOTION to Dismiss filed by Debra A Wells. Case Closed. Signed by Judge Salvador Mendoza, Jr. (SK, Case Administrator)

Download PDF
1 FILED IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON FILED IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 2 Oct 19, 2016 SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK Oct 19, 2016 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 3 SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK 4 DEBRA A. WELLS, a single woman, No. 2:16-CV-0259-SMJ 5 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING CASE 6 v. 7 8 9 BANK OF AMERICA NA and SUTTEL HAMMER & WHITE, P.S., a licensed corporation doing business in the state of Washington, Defendants. 10 11 On October 18, 2016, the parties filed a Proposed Order of Dismissal, ECF 12 No. 12, which the Court construes as a Motion to Dismiss. A Notice of 13 Settlement, ECF No. 10, was filed by the Plaintiff notifying the Court that 14 settlement had been reached. The Court then issued an order directing the parties 15 to file a joint status report advising if settlement had been completed and directing 16 the parties to alert the Court when they would seek the case dismissed. ECF No. 17 11. Consistent with the parties’ agreement and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 18 41(a), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 19 1. 20 ORDER - 1 The parties’ Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 12, is GRANTED. 1 2. All claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with all parties to bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees. 2 3 3. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. 4 4. All hearings and other deadlines are STRICKEN. 5 5. The Clerk’s Office is directed to CLOSE this file. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk’s Office is directed to enter this Order 7 8 and provide copies to all counsel. DATED this 19th day of October 2016. 9 __________________________ SALVADOR MENDOZA, JR. United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?