Alliance For The Wild Rockies v. Pena et al
Filing
41
ORDER denying 40 Motion for Reconsideration Signed by Judge Rosanna Malouf Peterson. (VR, Courtroom Deputy)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
6
7
ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD
ROCKIES,
NO: 2:16-CV-294-RMP
8
Plaintiff,
9
10
11
12
13
v.
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
JIM PENA, in his official capacity as
Regional Forester of Region Six U.S.
Forest Service; UNITED STATES
FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the
United States; and RODNEY
SMOLDON, in his official capacity as
Supervisor of the Colville National
Forest,
14
Defendants.
15
16
17
18
BEFORE THE COURT is Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration, ECF No.
40. The Court has reviewed the motion, the record, and is fully informed.
Plaintiff objects to the Court’s ruling allowing Defendants an additional
19
opportunity to respond to Plaintiff’s overlength Reply Brief, arguing that no new
20
issues were raised in the Reply and that Defendants have failed to adhere to the
21
word-count limits imposed by the Local Rules. See ECF No. 40. The Court granted
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION ~ 1
1
Defendants an additional response in conjunction with its ruling that allowed
2
Plaintiff to file its overlength Reply Brief, which, the Court notes, is longer than the
3
initial Memorandum in support of the Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (not
4
including the supporting affidavits). See ECF No. 12. The Court imposed
5
reasonable limits on Defendants’ ability to respond and Plaintiff still has the final
6
word. Therefore, the Court finds no good cause to reconsider its prior order.
7
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
8
Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration, ECF No. 40, is DENIED.
9
The District Court Clerk is directed to enter this Order and provide copies to
10
11
12
13
counsel.
DATED this 3rd day of October 2016.
s/ Rosanna Malouf Peterson
ROSANNA MALOUF PETERSON
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION ~ 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?