Riordan v. Colvin

Filing 20

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 19 TO GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 14 AND DENY DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 15 . Signed by Senior Judge Fred Van Sickle. (VR, Courtroom Deputy)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 5 LORETTA D. RIORDAN, No. 2:16-CV-00317-FVS 6 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENY DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 7 Plaintiff, vs. 8 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 9 SECURITY, 10 ECF Nos. 14, 15, 19 Defendant. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 BEFORE THE COURT is the Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Mary K. Dimke on September 15, 2017, ECF No. 19, recommending Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 14, be granted and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 15, be denied. No objection was filed. After review, the Court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 19, is ADOPTED in its entirety. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENY DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ~ 1 1 2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 14, is 2 GRANTED. 3 3. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 15, is 4 DENIED. 5 4. 6 The District Court Executive is directed to file this Order and forward copies An application for attorney fees may be filed by separate motion. 7 to the parties. Judgment shall be entered for Plaintiff and the file shall be CLOSED. 8 9 10 11 DATED October 5, 2017. s/Fred Van Sickle Fred Van Sickle Senior United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENY DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ~ 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?