Lebow v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
17
ORDER ADOPTING 16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT 13 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENY 14 DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Senior Judge Fred Van Sickle. (PL, Case Administrator)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
5 CORIANNE LEBOW,
No. 2:16-CV-00319-FVS
6
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND
DENY DEFENDANT’S MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
7
Plaintiff,
vs.
8 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
9 SECURITY,
10
ECF Nos. 13, 14, 16
Defendant.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
BEFORE THE COURT is the Report and Recommendation issued by
Magistrate Judge Mary K. Dimke on July 31, 2017, ECF No. 16, recommending
Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 13, be granted and
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 14, be denied. No
objection was filed. After review, the Court hereby adopts the Report and
Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED:
1.
The Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 16, is ADOPTED in its
entirety.
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANT
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ~ 1
1
2.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 13, is
2 GRANTED.
3
3.
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 14, is
4 DENIED.
5
4.
6
The District Court Executive is directed to file this Order and forward copies
An application for attorney fees may be filed by separate motion.
7 to the parties. Judgment shall be entered for Plaintiff and the file shall be CLOSED.
8
9
10
11
DATED August 16, 2017.
s/Fred Van Sickle
Fred Van Sickle
Senior United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANT
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ~ 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?