Lawson v. Washington State Department of Corrections DOC et al

Filing 16

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Re: 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Motions terminated: 4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Geoffrey Robert Lawson, Sr, 6 MOTION filed by Geoffrey Robert Lawson, Sr. Signed by Judge Salvador Mendoza, Jr. (AY, Case Administrator) **2 PAGES, PRINT ALL** (Geoffrey Lawson, Prisoner ID: 334928)

Download PDF
FILED IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 1 Mar 22, 2017 2 SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 3 4 5 GEOFFREY ROBERT LAWSON, SR., Plaintiff, 6 9 10 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION v. 7 8 No. 2:16-CV-0361-SMJ WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BERNARD WARNER, BRANDON WELLS, MARTHA HAYES, TAMRA AVERY, ISRAEL “ROY” GONZALES and JANE DOE SAIZ, 11 Defendants. 12 13 Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Dimke’s March 1, 2017 Report and 14 Recommendation, ECF No. 13, recommending that this Court deny Plaintiff’s 15 Motions, ECF Nos. 4, and 6.. The Plaintiff filed a timely objection on March 14, 16 2017, ECF No. 15. 17 After reviewing the Report and Recommendation, and relevant authorities, 18 the Court finds the Magistrate Judge’s findings are correct. Therefore, the Court 19 adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. 20 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: ORDER - 1 1 1. entirety. 2 3 The Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 13, is ADOPTED in its 2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction, ECF No. 4, and 4 Plaintiff’s Motion to Supplement Motion for Preliminary Injunction, 5 ECF No. 6, are DENIED. 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk’s Office is directed to enter this Order and provide copies to all parties and Magistrate Judge Dimke. DATED this 22nd day of March 2017. 9 __________________________ SALVADOR MENDOZA, JR. United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?