Lawson v. Washington State Department of Corrections DOC et al

Filing 97

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff. (AY, Case Administrator) **1 PAGE, PRINT ALL** (Geoffrey Lawson, Prisoner ID: 334928)

Download PDF
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the_ Eastern District of Washington FILED IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON Geoffrey Robert Lawson, Sr., Plaintiff v. Dan Pacholke; Eldon Vail; Israel Roy Gonzales; Brandon Wells; Martha Hayes; Tamera Avery; Lori Wonders; John Does 1-10; Paul Barker; Bonnie Longino; H. Hernandez; Lt. D. Buss; Lt. M. Marry; CC2 Jordan; Bernard Warner; Rachel Shook; and Tracy Stuenkel, Jan 18, 2019 ) ) ) ) ) SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK Civil Action No. 2:16-cv-00361-SMJ Defendant JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION The court has ordered that (check one): ’ the plaintiff (name) defendant (name) recover from the the amount of ), which includes prejudgment % per annum, along with costs. dollars ($ %, plus post judgment interest at the rate of interest at the rate of ’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name) recover costs from the plaintiff (name) . ’ other: Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Request for Frivolous Finding (ECF No. 72) is GRANTED; Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and Plaintiff is issued a “strike” under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants This action was (check one): ’ tried by a jury with Judge rendered a verdict. ’ tried by Judge was reached. ’ decided by Judge presiding, and the jury has without a jury and the above decision on a motion to SALVADOR MENDOZA, JR. Dismiss and Request for Frivolous Finding (ECF No. 72) Date: 01/18/2019 CLERK OF COURT SEAN F. McAVOY s/ Allison Yates (By) Deputy Clerk Allison Yates

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?