Lawson v. Washington State Department of Corrections DOC et al
Filing
97
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff. (AY, Case Administrator) **1 PAGE, PRINT ALL** (Geoffrey Lawson, Prisoner ID: 334928)
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the_
Eastern District of Washington
FILED IN THE
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Geoffrey Robert Lawson, Sr.,
Plaintiff
v.
Dan Pacholke; Eldon Vail; Israel Roy Gonzales; Brandon
Wells; Martha Hayes; Tamera Avery; Lori Wonders; John
Does 1-10; Paul Barker; Bonnie Longino; H. Hernandez; Lt.
D. Buss; Lt. M. Marry; CC2 Jordan; Bernard Warner;
Rachel Shook; and Tracy Stuenkel,
Jan 18, 2019
)
)
)
)
)
SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK
Civil Action No. 2:16-cv-00361-SMJ
Defendant
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
’ the plaintiff (name)
defendant (name)
recover from the
the amount of
), which includes prejudgment
% per annum, along with costs.
dollars ($
%, plus post judgment interest at the rate of
interest at the rate of
’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
.
’ other: Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Request for Frivolous Finding (ECF No. 72) is GRANTED;
Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and
Plaintiff is issued a “strike” under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants
This action was (check one):
’ tried by a jury with Judge
rendered a verdict.
’ tried by Judge
was reached.
’ decided by Judge
presiding, and the jury has
without a jury and the above decision
on a motion to
SALVADOR MENDOZA, JR.
Dismiss and Request for Frivolous Finding (ECF No. 72)
Date: 01/18/2019
CLERK OF COURT
SEAN F. McAVOY
s/ Allison Yates
(By) Deputy Clerk
Allison Yates
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?