Montrose Environmental Group Inc et al v. Zephyr Air Quality Services LLC et al

Filing 16

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AS TO DEFENDANTS TIMOTHY J. HOMER AND TAMMY D. MESSING - granting 14 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Stanley A. Bastian. (CC, Case Administrator)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 9 MONTROSE ENVIRONMENTAL No. 2:16-cv-00433-SAB 10 GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation; 11 and MONTROSE AIR QUALITY ORDER GRANTING 12 SERVICES, LLC, a Delaware limited STIPULATED MOTION FOR 13 liability company, PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 14 Plaintiffs, AS TO DEFENDANTS 15 v. TIMOTHY J. HOMER AND 16 ZEPHYR AIR QUALITY SERVICES, TAMMY D. MESSING 17 LLC, a Washington limited liability 18 company; TIMOTHY J. HOMER, an 19 individual; the MARITAL COMMUNITY 20 OF TIMOTHY J. HOMER AND TAMMY 21 D. MESSING; CLAYTON KRIETZMAN, 22 an individual; and COLLIN ROSE, an 23 individual, 24 Defendants. 25 26 Before the Court is a Stipulated Motion for an Order Granting Plaintiffs 27 Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. and Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC a 28 Preliminary Injunction as to Defendants Timothy J. Homer, Tammy D. Messing, ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR ORDER . . . ^1 1 and the Marital Community of Timothy J. Homer and Tammy D. Messing, ECF 2 No. 14. The Plaintiffs stipulate with these specific Defendants to allow the entry 3 and enforcement of a preliminary injunction while denying liability in the 4 substantive claims at issue. The Court is empowered to enter and enforce 5 stipulated preliminary injunctions. Cuviello v. City of Oakland, No. C 06-5517 6 MHP, 2009 WL 3707014, at *4 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2009). Because this injunction 7 preserves the status quo and is agreed to by the above Defendants, it is “fair, 8 reasonable[,] and equitable and does not violate the law or public policy.” Sierra 9 Club, Inc. v. Elec. Controls Design, Inc., 909 F.2d 1350, 1355 (9th Cir. 1990). The 10 Court finds good cause to GRANT the motion and ENTER the preliminary 11 injunction. 12 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 13 1. The Stipulated Motion for an Order Granting Plaintiffs Montrose 14 Environmental Group, Inc. and Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC a Preliminary 15 Injunction as to Defendants Timothy J. Homer, Tammy D. Messing, and the 16 Marital Community of Timothy J. Homer and Tammy D. Messing, ECF No. 14, is 17 GRANTED. 18 2. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction, ECF No. 4, is GRANTED 19 as far as all Defendants have stipulated to it. 20 3. The Court hereby ENTERS the below preliminary injunction which is 21 enforceable against Defendants Timothy J. Homer, Tammy D. Messing, and the 22 Marital Community of Timothy J. Homer and Tammy D. Messing. 23 24 4. The preliminary injunction is as follows: A. As of the date of this Motion and until lifted by the Court, the 25 Homers shall not access, copy, disclose, or disseminate any Montrose files or data 26 – including all files and data originally sold by Bighorn Environmental Air 27 Quality, LLC to Montrose – on (a) any Dropbox account controlled by Tim 28 Homer, and/or (b) any other cloud storage or storage device accessible via the ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR ORDER . . . ^2 1 Internet or other network that contains any Montrose files or data – (collectively, 2 “Network Storage”), without written agreement of the parties or order of the 3 Court. 4 B. The Homers shall likewise not take any action to delete or 5 destroy any such data in Network Storage, and shall not direct or permit anyone to 6 do so on their behalf. 7 C. The Homers shall not access, copy, disclose, or disseminate 8 any Montrose files or data – including all files and data originally purchased from 9 Bighorn – on hard drives, flash drives, SD cards, cell phones, and other external 10 drives or storage media used by or accessible to the Homers that contain any of 11 Plaintiffs’ documents, data or other property (collectively “Local Storage”) again 12 absent written agreement of the parties or order of the Court. Notwithstanding the 13 forgoing, the Homers may remove data from any local hard drive or personal 14 computer provided that prior to the removal of any data, they first have a complete 15 and entire physical disk image made of such hard drive or personal computer, 16 preserving the contents of said hard drive or personal computer and to the 17 reasonable satisfaction of Montrose. 18 D. The Homers shall undertake all reasonable and required efforts 19 to preserve all data and documents in their possession that relate to Montrose’s 20 allegations in this matter, including, without limitation, all data and documents 21 pertaining to Zephyr Air Quality Services, LLC. 22 E. Defendant Timothy J. Homer reaffirms and will comply with 23 all obligations and covenants contained in the Asset Purchase Agreement Among 24 Bighorn Environmental Air Quality, LLC, Tim Homer, and Montrose Air Quality 25 Services, LLC (October 24, 2014) (the “APA”), including, without limitation,¶ 9.3 26 of that agreement for the remaining term of the APA. And pursuant to that 27 provision, Timothy Homer agrees that he is restricted from “Carrying on a 28 Business,” as that term is defined in §9.3(c)(i) of the APA, with defendant Zephyr ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR ORDER . . . ^3 1 Air Quality Services LLC or any other company or individual providing 2 environmental related services for the remainder of the three-year term of that 3 provision following the Closing Date of the APA. 4 F. Due to the fact that they are stipulating to the entry of this 5 injunction, the Homers waive any requirement for Montrose to file a bond as 6 security under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c). 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter this Order 8 and forward copies to counsel. 9 DATED this 27th day of January, 2017. 10 11 12 13 14 15 Stanley A. Bastian United States District Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR ORDER . . . ^4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?