Montrose Environmental Group Inc et al v. Zephyr Air Quality Services LLC et al
Filing
16
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AS TO DEFENDANTS TIMOTHY J. HOMER AND TAMMY D. MESSING - granting 14 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Stanley A. Bastian. (CC, Case Administrator)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
8
9 MONTROSE ENVIRONMENTAL
No. 2:16-cv-00433-SAB
10 GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation;
11 and MONTROSE AIR QUALITY
ORDER GRANTING
12 SERVICES, LLC, a Delaware limited
STIPULATED MOTION FOR
13 liability company,
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
14
Plaintiffs,
AS TO DEFENDANTS
15
v.
TIMOTHY J. HOMER AND
16 ZEPHYR AIR QUALITY SERVICES,
TAMMY D. MESSING
17 LLC, a Washington limited liability
18 company; TIMOTHY J. HOMER, an
19 individual; the MARITAL COMMUNITY
20 OF TIMOTHY J. HOMER AND TAMMY
21 D. MESSING; CLAYTON KRIETZMAN,
22 an individual; and COLLIN ROSE, an
23 individual,
24
Defendants.
25
26
Before the Court is a Stipulated Motion for an Order Granting Plaintiffs
27 Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. and Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC a
28 Preliminary Injunction as to Defendants Timothy J. Homer, Tammy D. Messing,
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR ORDER . . . ^1
1 and the Marital Community of Timothy J. Homer and Tammy D. Messing, ECF
2 No. 14. The Plaintiffs stipulate with these specific Defendants to allow the entry
3 and enforcement of a preliminary injunction while denying liability in the
4 substantive claims at issue. The Court is empowered to enter and enforce
5 stipulated preliminary injunctions. Cuviello v. City of Oakland, No. C 06-5517
6 MHP, 2009 WL 3707014, at *4 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2009). Because this injunction
7 preserves the status quo and is agreed to by the above Defendants, it is “fair,
8 reasonable[,] and equitable and does not violate the law or public policy.” Sierra
9 Club, Inc. v. Elec. Controls Design, Inc., 909 F.2d 1350, 1355 (9th Cir. 1990). The
10 Court finds good cause to GRANT the motion and ENTER the preliminary
11 injunction.
12
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
13
1. The Stipulated Motion for an Order Granting Plaintiffs Montrose
14 Environmental Group, Inc. and Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC a Preliminary
15 Injunction as to Defendants Timothy J. Homer, Tammy D. Messing, and the
16 Marital Community of Timothy J. Homer and Tammy D. Messing, ECF No. 14, is
17 GRANTED.
18
2. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction, ECF No. 4, is GRANTED
19 as far as all Defendants have stipulated to it.
20
3. The Court hereby ENTERS the below preliminary injunction which is
21 enforceable against Defendants Timothy J. Homer, Tammy D. Messing, and the
22 Marital Community of Timothy J. Homer and Tammy D. Messing.
23
24
4. The preliminary injunction is as follows:
A. As of the date of this Motion and until lifted by the Court, the
25 Homers shall not access, copy, disclose, or disseminate any Montrose files or data
26 – including all files and data originally sold by Bighorn Environmental Air
27 Quality, LLC to Montrose – on (a) any Dropbox account controlled by Tim
28 Homer, and/or (b) any other cloud storage or storage device accessible via the
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR ORDER . . . ^2
1 Internet or other network that contains any Montrose files or data – (collectively,
2 “Network Storage”), without written agreement of the parties or order of the
3 Court.
4
B. The Homers shall likewise not take any action to delete or
5 destroy any such data in Network Storage, and shall not direct or permit anyone to
6 do so on their behalf.
7
C. The Homers shall not access, copy, disclose, or disseminate
8 any Montrose files or data – including all files and data originally purchased from
9 Bighorn – on hard drives, flash drives, SD cards, cell phones, and other external
10 drives or storage media used by or accessible to the Homers that contain any of
11 Plaintiffs’ documents, data or other property (collectively “Local Storage”) again
12 absent written agreement of the parties or order of the Court. Notwithstanding the
13 forgoing, the Homers may remove data from any local hard drive or personal
14 computer provided that prior to the removal of any data, they first have a complete
15 and entire physical disk image made of such hard drive or personal computer,
16 preserving the contents of said hard drive or personal computer and to the
17 reasonable satisfaction of Montrose.
18
D. The Homers shall undertake all reasonable and required efforts
19 to preserve all data and documents in their possession that relate to Montrose’s
20 allegations in this matter, including, without limitation, all data and documents
21 pertaining to Zephyr Air Quality Services, LLC.
22
E. Defendant Timothy J. Homer reaffirms and will comply with
23 all obligations and covenants contained in the Asset Purchase Agreement Among
24 Bighorn Environmental Air Quality, LLC, Tim Homer, and Montrose Air Quality
25 Services, LLC (October 24, 2014) (the “APA”), including, without limitation,¶ 9.3
26 of that agreement for the remaining term of the APA. And pursuant to that
27 provision, Timothy Homer agrees that he is restricted from “Carrying on a
28 Business,” as that term is defined in §9.3(c)(i) of the APA, with defendant Zephyr
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR ORDER . . . ^3
1 Air Quality Services LLC or any other company or individual providing
2 environmental related services for the remainder of the three-year term of that
3 provision following the Closing Date of the APA.
4
F. Due to the fact that they are stipulating to the entry of this
5 injunction, the Homers waive any requirement for Montrose to file a bond as
6 security under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c).
7
IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter this Order
8 and forward copies to counsel.
9
DATED this 27th day of January, 2017.
10
11
12
13
14
15
Stanley A. Bastian
United States District Judge
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR ORDER . . . ^4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?