Melville et al v. The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation et al

Filing 60

JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants Chase Home Finance, JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association, and The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, against Daniel P Melville and Mary R Melville. (LR, Case Administrator)

Download PDF
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for th _ Eastern District of Washington Mar 01, 2018 DANIEL P. MELVILLE and MARY R. MELVILLE, Plaintiff v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION, et al. FILED IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK Civil Action No. 2:17-cv-30-RMP Defendant JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION The court has ordered that (check one): the plaintiff (name) defendant (name) recover from the the amount of ), which includes prejudgment % per annum, along with costs. dollars ($ %, plus post judgment interest at the rate of interest at the rate of the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name) recover costs from the plaintiff (name) . ✔ other: Defendants Chase and BNY Mellon Trustee's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 45) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' FDCPA claims against Chase and BNY Mellon Trustee are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Judgment is entered for Defendants Chase and BNY Mellon Trustee (named on the Complaint as “The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, also known as The Bank of New York as Trustee for Citicorp Mortgage Securities Trust Series 2007-6”; “Chase Home Finance”; and “JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association.”) This action was (check one): tried by a jury with Judge rendered a verdict. tried by Judge was reached. ✔ decided by Judge presiding, and the jury has without a jury and the above decision Rosanna Malouf Peterson on a motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 45). Date: 3/1/2018 CLERK OF COURT SEAN F. McAVOY s/ Lennie Rasmussen Deputy Clerk Lennie Rasmussen

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?