Alcon Laboratories Inc v. Good Eyeglasses Optical et al

Filing 35

FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION in favor of Alcon Laboratories Inc against Focus Works Ltd, Good Eyeglasses Optical. Signed by Judge Rosanna Malouf Peterson. (PL, Case Administrator)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6 7 ALCON LABORATORIES, INC., NO: 2:17-CV-54-RMP Plaintiff, 8 9 10 11 FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION v. GOOD EYEGLASSES OPTICAL, a British Columbia sole proprietorship; and FOCUS WORKS, LTD., a British Columbia corporation, 12 Defendants. 13 14 15 16 By and with the consent of Plaintiff and Defendant, the Court enters the following final judgment and permanent injunction: 1. This Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 17 1121, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1332(a)(2), 1338(b), 1391(b), and Washington’s long- 18 arm statute, RCW 4.28 et seq. Defendants stipulated to jurisdiction and venue in 19 the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, and 20 Defendants specifically waived all defenses and objections to jurisdiction and 21 venue. ECF No. 3. ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF INJUNCTION ORDER AND JUDGMENT AND STIPULATED MOTION TO EXPEDITE ~ 1 1 2 3 4 2. The parties stipulated to the entry of this Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction against Defendants. 3. On May 19, 2017, the Clerk of the Court entered default judgment for Plaintiff on all its claims. ECF No. 6. The terms of the default judgment state: 5 A. Judgment Creditor: Alcon Laboratories, Inc. 6 B. Judgment Debtors, Joint & Several: Good Eyeglasses Optical, a 7 British Columbia sole proprietorship, and Focus Works Ltd., a British 8 Columbia corporation. 9 C. Principal Amount of Judgment: $163,175.00 10 D. Reasonable Attorney Fees: $28,000 11 E. Costs: $1,644.67 12 F. Post judgment interest rate set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a) 13 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 14 1. The judgment as set forth above is hereby entered against the 15 Defendants, jointly and severally, on each of Plaintiff’s claims for federal 16 trademark infringement in violation of 15 U.S.C. §1114, et seq., common law 17 trademark in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), common law unfair competition, 18 and violation of the Washington Consumer Protection Act in violation of RCW 19 19.86.020 et seq. 20 21 2. Plaintiff is awarded judgment against Defendants Good Eyeglasses Optical and Focus Works Ltd. jointly and severally in the principal sum of ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF INJUNCTION ORDER AND JUDGMENT AND STIPULATED MOTION TO EXPEDITE ~ 2 1 $163,175.00, together with reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of 2 $29,644.67, for a total judgment of $192,819.67. Interest shall accrue on this 3 judgment at the post-judgment interest rate authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a). 4 3. Defendants Good Eyeglasses Optical and Focus Works Ltd and any 5 other persons or entities acting in concert or participation with or on behalf of 6 Defendants, including their officers, directors, servants, employees, agents, 7 representatives, and distributors, including but not limited to Contact Lens Club, 8 Online Optical, Jag Bains (a/k/a Jagmohan Bains and Jagmohan S. Bains), and 9 Reggie Thornhill, are immediately and permanently restrained in the United States 10 from: 11 A. 12 shipping, transporting, licensing, offering for sale, selling, developing, 13 displaying, delivering, advertising, and/or otherwise marketing or disposing 14 of products bearing any trademark that is the same as, or confusingly similar 15 to, any mark owned or used by Alcon and/or its related companies for 16 contact lenses and/or other eye-care products; 17 B. 18 representing or otherwise participating in either directly or indirectly any 19 website, social media account, online marketplace or mobile application, 20 which advertises, displays, distributes, offers for sales, sells and/or otherwise 21 markets products bearing any trademark that is the same as, or confusingly Making, manufacturing, importing, ordering, using, distributing, Owning, operating, managing, controlling, advising, consulting, ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF INJUNCTION ORDER AND JUDGMENT AND STIPULATED MOTION TO EXPEDITE ~ 3 1 similar to, any mark owned or used by Alcon and/or its related companies 2 for contact lenses and/or other eye-care products; 3 C. 4 quality of Alcon contact lenses and/or other eye-care products; 5 D. 6 bearing any mark owned or used by Alcon and/or its related companies or 7 any similar trademark; and 8 E. 9 and/or its related companies. 10 11 12 13 14 4. Misrepresenting in any way the source of origin or the nature or Selling or otherwise distributing contact lenses in the United States Further conduct which infringes any mark owned or used by Alcon This Court retains jurisdiction over any disputes between the parties with respect to the enforcement and/or interpretation of this Judgment. The District Court Clerk is directed to enter this Order, enter Judgment accordingly, provide copies to counsel, and close this case. DATED September 12, 2017. 15 16 s/ Rosanna Malouf Peterson ROSANNA MALOUF PETERSON United States District Judge 17 18 19 20 21 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF INJUNCTION ORDER AND JUDGMENT AND STIPULATED MOTION TO EXPEDITE ~ 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?