Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Thornton et al
JUDGMENT in favor of Plaintiff Scottsdale Insurance Company and Third Party Defendant Metropolitan Group Property and Casualty Insurance Company. (PL, Case Administrator)
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FILED IN THE
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
for th _
Eastern District of Washington
Jan 11, 2018
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Ohio
LEE THORNTON (dba Malo Store) individually, et al.,
Defendants/Third Party Plaintiffs
METROPOLITAN GROUP PROPERTY AND
CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,
SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK
Civil Action No. 2:17-CV-00077-JLQ
Third Party Defendant
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
the plaintiff (name)
recover from the
the amount of
), which includes prejudgment
% per annum, along with costs.
%, plus post judgment interest at the rate of
interest at the rate of
the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
Third-Party Defendant Metropolitan Group Property and Casualty Insurance Company's Motion for Summary Judgment
(ECF No. 44) and Plaintiff Scottsdale Insurance Company's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 48) are
GRANTED; Defendants Season Hamilton, Glenn Thornton, and Estate of E.T.'s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF
No. 49) and Defendant Lee and Julie Thornton's Amended Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 53) are DENIED.
Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Scottsdale Insurance Company and Third-Party Defendant Metropolitan Group
Property and Casualty Insurance Company.
This action was (check one):
tried by a jury with Judge
rendered a verdict.
tried by Judge
✔ decided by Judge
presiding, and the jury has
without a jury and the above decision
Justin L. Quackenbush
on Motions for Summary Judgment
(ECF Nos. 44, 48, 49, and 53).
Date: January 11, 2018
CLERK OF COURT
SEAN F. McAVOY
s/ Penny Lamb
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?