Coughlin v. Denham
Filing
9
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS SUIT Re: 8 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Salvador Mendoza, Jr. (AY, Case Administrator)
1
FILED IN THE
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
2
May 10, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
3
SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK
4
JESSE D. COUGHLIN,
No. 2:17-CV-0113-SMJ
5
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO DISMISS SUIT
6
v.
7
DEBRA DENHAM,
8
Defendant.
9
10
Before the Court, without oral argument, is Plaintiff Jesse D. Coughlin’s
11
Motion to Dismiss Suit, ECF No. 8. Through this motion, Plaintiff seeks an order
12
from this Court dismissing the above captioned matter. Although the Defendant
13
has not stated her position with respect to the motion, the Plaintiff indicated that
14
he believes the motion will be unopposed. Id. The Defendant has not answered,
15
filed counterclaims, or otherwise responded to Plaintiff’s complaint. However, the
16
United States Attorney’s Office has entered an appearance as an interested party.
17
ECF No. 6.
18
Having reviewed the pleadings and the file in this matter, the Court is fully
19
informed and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) GRANTS the
20
motion.
ORDER - 1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
2
1.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss Suit, ECF No. 8, is GRANTED.
3
2.
All claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, with all
parties to bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees.
4
5
3.
All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.
6
4.
All hearings and other deadlines are STRICKEN.
7
5.
The Clerk’s Office is directed to CLOSE this file.
8
IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk’s Office is directed to enter this Order
9
10
and provide copies to all counsel and pro se Plaintiff.
DATED this 10th day of May 2017.
11
__________________________
SALVADOR MENDOZA, JR.
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?