United States of America v. Approximately $6,595.00 U.S. Currency
Filing
16
FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE, granting 15 MOTION for Forfeiture of Property RE Entry of a Final Order of Forfeiture filed by United States of America. Case Closed. Signed by Judge Salvador Mendoza, Jr. (LR, Case Administrator)
FILED IN THE
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
1
Nov 27, 2017
2
SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
3
4
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
No. 1:17-CV-0269-SMJ
5
Plaintiff,
FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE
6
v.
7
8
APPROXIMATELY $6,595.00 U.S.
CURRENCY,
9
Defendant.
10
Before the Court, without oral argument, is the United States of America’s
11
Motion for Entry of Final Order of Forfeiture, ECF No. 15. Plaintiff, the United
12
States of America, alleged in a Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem that
13
Defendant currency captioned above is subject to forfeiture to the United States
14
pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881. ECF No. 1. The Court has jurisdiction over that matter
15
under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1345, 1355. Venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1355.
16
The Defendant property being sought for forfeiture is described as follows:
17
– Approximately $3,895.00 U.S. currency seized on or about November 2,
18
2016, incident to arrest.
19
– Approximately $2,700.00 U.S. currency seized on or about November 2,
20
2016, pursuant to consent.
FINAL ORDER
OF FORFEITURE - 1
1
2
On August 23, 2017, the United States marshals Service executed and filed
the Warrant of Arrest In Rem with the Court. ECF No. 5.
3
In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(4)(a)(iv)(C), Supplemental Rules for
4
Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset forfeiture Actions, notice of civil
5
forfeiture was posted on an official government website from August 12, 2017 to
6
September 21, 2017. ECF Nos. 8, 8-1 and 8-2. Based on the internet publication
7
start date of August 3, 2017, the last date to file a timely claim absent direct notice
8
was October 22, 2017. The United States served, via regular first-class mail and
9
certified mail, direct notice to the Otha Anderson, see ECF No. 13, and Samantha
10
Knight, see ECF No. 12. No claims, timely or otherwise, have been received or filed
11
with the Court, and the deadline for filing timely claims has passed.
12
13
14
It appearing to the Court that any and all interests in the Defendant Property
have been resolved, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1.
ECF No. 15, is GRANTED.
15
16
The United States’ Motion for Entry of a Final Order of Forfeiture,
2.
The Defendant Property described as follows is hereby forfeited to the
17
United States of America, and no right, title, or interest shall exist in
18
any other person.
19
A.
20
Approximately $3,895.00 U.S. currency seized on or about
November 2, 2016, incident to arrest.
FINAL ORDER
OF FORFEITURE - 2
B.
1
November 2, 2016, pursuant to consent.
2
3
3.
The United States Marshals Service shall dispose of the forfeited
property described herein in accordance with law.
4
5
Approximately $2,700.00 U.S. currency seized on or about
4.
This Court shall retain jurisdiction in the case for the purpose of
enforcing or amending this order.
6
7
5.
The Clerk’s office shall CLOSE this case.
8
6.
All deadlines and hearings set in this matter are STRICKEN.
9
IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk’s Office is directed to enter this Order and
10
11
12
13
provide copies the United States Marshals Service and to all counsel.
DATED this 27th day of November 2017.
_________________________
SALVADOR MENDOZA, JR.
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
FINAL ORDER
OF FORFEITURE - 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?