Mesecher et al v. Lowes Companies Inc et al

Filing 13

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Lowe's and Monsanto are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (LR, Case Administrator)

Download PDF
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for th _ Eastern District of Washington FILED IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON Feb 08, 2018 TRACY E. MESECHER, husband; CHARICE A. MESECHER, wife; and MIKAYALA M. REYNOLDS, Plaintiff v. LOWES COMPANIES, INC, a corporate entity; MONSANTO, a corporate entity; and HD HUDSON MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ) ) ) ) ) SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK Civil Action No. 2:17-CV-299-RMP Defendant JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION The court has ordered that (check one): the plaintiff (name) defendant (name) recover from the the amount of ), which includes prejudgment % per annum, along with costs. dollars ($ %, plus post judgment interest at the rate of interest at the rate of the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name) recover costs from the plaintiff (name) . ✔ other: Defendant Lowe's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 8) is GRANTED. Defendant Monsanto's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(B)(6), (ECF No. 11), is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Lowe's and Monsanto are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and Defendants Lowe's and Monsanto are dismissed as Defendants. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Lowe's and Monsanto. This action was (check one): tried by a jury with Judge rendered a verdict. tried by Judge was reached. ✔ decided by Judge presiding, and the jury has without a jury and the above decision Rosanna Malouf Peterson on motions to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 8 and 11). Date: 2/8/2018 CLERK OF COURT SEAN F. McAVOY s/ Lennie Rasmussen Deputy Clerk Lennie Rasmussen

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?