United States of America et al v. Cardinal Health Inc et al
Filing
76
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL without prejudice in favor of Defendants. (LTR, Case Administrator)
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for th _
Eastern District of Washington
FILED IN THE
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Sep 29, 2021
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, exs rel. UPPI, LLC;
and UPPI, LLC, qui tam as Relator,
)
v.
)
CARDINAL HEALTH, INC; CARDINAL HEALTH 414, LLC, doing
)
business as Cardinal Health Nuclear Pharmacy Services; CARDINAL
)
HEALTH 200, LLC; D’S VENTURES, LLC, doing business as Logmet
Solutions, LLC; CARING HANDS HEALTH EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES, )
SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK
Plaintiff-Relators
Civil Action No. 2:17-CV-378-RMP
LLC; OTHER UNNAMED SMALL BUSINESS FRONT COMPANIES;
OBIE B. BACON; DEMAURICE SCOTT; and UNNAMED
INDIVIDUALS (Does),
Defendants
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
the plaintiff (name)
defendant (name)
recover from the
the amount of
), which includes prejudgment
% per annum, along with costs.
dollars ($
%, plus post judgment interest at the rate of
interest at the rate of
the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
.
✔ other:
Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (ECF Nos. 58, 59, and 61) are GRANTED and Relator’s
Amended Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants.
This action was (check one):
tried by a jury with Judge
rendered a verdict.
presiding, and the jury has
tried by Judge
was reached.
✔ decided by Judge
without a jury and the above decision
Rosanna Malouf Peterson
on
Motions to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (ECF Nos. 58, 59, and 61).
Date: 9/29/2021
CLERK OF COURT
SEAN F. McAVOY
s/ Lee Reams
Deputy Clerk
Lee Reams
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?