Hofstader v. Emergency Physician Services PS, et al

Filing 38

ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN SERVICES, P.S.; granting 37 Motion to Dismiss Defendant Emergency Physician Services PS. Emergency Physician Services PS terminated. Signed by Judge Stanley A Bastian. (AY, Case Administrator)

Download PDF
1 FILED IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 2 Jan 08, 2019 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 3 SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK 4 5 6 NATHAN HOFSTADER and RICHARD CERENZIA, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff, 7 10 11 2:18-CV-00062-SMJ ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN SERVICES, P.S. v. 8 9 No. EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN SERVICES PS; PROVIDENCE HEALTH AND SERVICES; SACRED HEART MEDICAL CENTER; and PROVIDENCE HOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL, 12 Defendants. 13 14 Before the Court is the parties’ Stipulated Motion to Dismiss Emergency 15 Physician Services, P.S. Only, ECF No. 37. Consistent with the parties’ agreement 16 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and (B), IT IS HEREBY 17 ORDERED: 18 1. Services, P.S. Only, ECF No. 37, is GRANTED. 19 20 The parties’ Stipulated Motion to Dismiss Emergency Physician 2. All claims against Defendant Emergency Physician Services, P.S. are ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN SERVICES, P.S. - 1 1 DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with all parties to bear their own 2 costs and attorney fees. 3 4 5 6 7 3. The Clerk’s Office is DIRECTED to TERMINATE Emergency Physician Services, P.S. as a defendant. IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk’s Office is directed to enter this Order and provide copies to all counsel. DATED this 8th day of January 2019. 8 9 ________________________ SALVADOR MENDOZA, JR. United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN SERVICES, P.S. - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?