Fayant v UnitedHealthcare of WA
Filing
14
ORDER GRANTING 9 LEAVE TO AMEND denying as moot 7 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Judge Salvador Mendoza, Jr. (AY, Case Administrator)
1
FILED IN THE
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
2
Jul 03, 2018
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
3
SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK
4
WILLIAM ROBERT FAYANT,
No. 2:18-cv-00102-SMJ
5
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO
AMEND
6
v.
7
UNITEDHEALTHCARE OF WA,
8
Defendant.
9
10
Defendant UnitedHealthcare of WA (UnitedHealth) moved to dismiss
11
Plaintiff William Robert Fayant’s complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
12
Procedure 12(b)(6). ECF No. 7. In response, Fayant, proceeding pro se, filed an
13
“Objection to Defendants Motion to Dismiss and . . . Motion for Leave to File
14
Amended Complaint.” ECF No. 9. The Court construes this filing as a motion for
15
leave to file an amended complaint. Because UnitedHealth does not object to this
16
request, ECF No. 11, and leave to amend should be freely given when justice
17
requires, Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2), the Court grants Fayant’s motion for leave to
18
amend.
19
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
20
ORDER - 1
1
1.
is GRANTED.
2
3
2.
Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint on or before August 3,
2018.
4
5
Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint, ECF No. 9,
3.
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 7, is DENIED AS
6
MOOT. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint, Defendant
7
may refile this motion after August 3, 2018.
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk’s Office is directed to enter this Order
and provide copies to all counsel and pro se plaintiff.
DATED this 3rd day of July 2018.
11
__________________________
SALVADOR MENDOZA, JR.
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?