Rembold v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
23
JUDGMENT in favor of Stacy Laine Rembold against Commissioner of Social Security. (VR, Courtroom Deputy)
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the_
Eastern District of Washington
FILED IN THE
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Apr 19, 2019
STACY R.,
SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK
Plaintiff
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 2:18-CV-167-SAB
Defendant
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
’ the plaintiff (name)
defendant (name)
interest at the rate of
recover from the
the amount of
), which includes prejudgment
% per annum, along with costs.
dollars ($
%, plus post judgment interest at the rate of
’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
.
’ other: The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Dimke’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 20, in its entirety. Plaintiff’s Motion
for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 14, is GRANTED. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 18, is
DENIED. The decision of the ALJ is REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security for further
proceedings consistent with the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation. Judgment is entered in favor of the Plaintiff.
This action was (check one):
’ tried by a jury with Judge
rendered a verdict.
presiding, and the jury has
’ tried by Judge
was reached.
’ decided by Judge
without a jury and the above decision
Stanley A. Bastian
on motions for
summary judgment.
Date: April 19, 2019
CLERK OF COURT
SEAN F. McAVOY
s/ Virginia Reisenauer
(By) Deputy Clerk
Virginia Reisenauer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?