Thiel et al v. Adams County Public Hospital District #2 et al
Filing
127
AMENDED JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION; Judgment for Defendants and against Plaintiffs as to Plaintiffs' Claims II, V, and VI. (SG, Case Administrator)
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for thH_
Eastern District of Washington
FILED IN THE
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Mar 06, 2025
ESTATE OF KAREN THIEL, and LAMAR THIEL,
Plaintiff
v.
ADAMS COUNTY PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT NO. 2,
d/b/a EAST ADAMS RURAL HEALTHCARE, d/b/a EAST
ADAMS RURAL HOSPITAL, a Washington Public Hospital
District, and MATTHEW MECHAM, an individual,
SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 2:21-CV-00279-SAB
Defendant
AMENDED JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
u the plaintiff (name)
defendant (name)
recover from the
the amount of
), which includes prejudgment
% per annum, along with costs.
dollars ($
%, plus post judgment interest at the rate of
interest at the rate of
u the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
.
u
? other: Defendant EARH’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 80, is GRANTED in part as to Plaintiffs’ 42 § 1983
claims; Defendant EARH’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 83, is GRANTED in part as to Plaintiffs’ 42 §
1983 claims; Plaintiffs’ Claims II, V, and VI are DISMISSED with prejudice; Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint as
to Claim I, Medical Malpractice, ECF No. 74, is REMANDED to the Adams County Superior Court.
Judgment for Defendants and against Plaintiffs as to Plaintiffs’ Claims II, V, and VI.
This action was (check one):
u tried by a jury with Judge
rendered a verdict.
presiding, and the jury has
u tried by Judge
was reached.
?
u decided by Judge
Date: March 6, 2025
without a jury and the above decision
Stanley A. Bastian.
CLERK OF COURT
SEAN F. McAVOY
s/ Sara Gore
%\ Deputy Clerk
Sara Gore
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?