Pena Arredondo v. Peshastin Hi-Up Growers

Filing 10

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and the parties stipulation, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Rice. (BF, Paralegal)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6 7 MIRIAM PEÑA ARREDONDO, NO: 2:23-CV-0235-TOR 8 9 10 Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE vs. PESHASTIN HI-UP GROWERS, a Washington cooperative association, 11 Defendant. 12 13 14 15 BEFORE THE COURT is the parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal with 16 Prejudice. ECF No. 9. The parties stipulate and that this action should 17 be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The 18 Court has reviewed the record and files herein and is fully informed. 19 20 According to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), a plaintiff may dismiss an action by filing a stipulation signed by all parties who have appeared. ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE ~ 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and the parties’ stipulation, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. 2. All deadlines and hearings are VACATED. The District Court Executive is directed to enter this Order and Judgment of Dismissal, furnish copies to counsel, and CLOSE the file. DATED November 13, 2023. 8 9 THOMAS O. RICE United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE ~ 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?