Armatis v. BNSF Railway Company
Filing
29
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; granting 28 Joint Motion to Dismiss. Dismissed with Prejudice. File is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Rice. (SG, Case Administrator)
1
2
FILED IN THE
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
3
Mar 07, 2025
4
SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
SCOTT ARMATIS,
NO: 2:23-CV-0279-TOR
Plaintiff,
vs.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, a
Delaware Corporation,
Defendant.
13
14
15
BEFORE THE COURT is the parties’ Joint Motion for Dismissal with
16
Prejudice. ECF No. 28. The parties jointly move the Court for an Order
17
dismissing the above-captioned matter with prejudice and without costs to either
18
party. The Court has reviewed the record and files herein and is fully informed.
19
20
According to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), a plaintiff may dismiss an action by filing
a stipulation signed by all parties who have appeared.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE ~ 1
1
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
2
1. The Joint Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 28, is GRANTED.
3
2. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and the parties’ stipulation, this action is
4
5
6
7
8
DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs to either party.
3. All deadlines, hearings, and trial are VACATED.
The District Court Executive is directed to enter this Order and Judgment of
Dismissal, furnish copies to counsel, and CLOSE the file.
DATED March 7, 2025.
9
10
11
THOMAS O. RICE
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE ~ 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?