Durham et al v. Department of Children, Youth, and Families et al
Filing
29
JUDGMENT in favor of Caring Hearts Visitation Center, Child Protective Services, Court Appointed Special Advocate, Department of Children, Youth, and Families, Encompass Family Services, Family Impact Network, Frontier Behavior Health - Wraparound Intensive Services, Services Alternative against John-Michael Ray Durham, Penny June Shelton. (BM, Case Administrator) (Service of Notice on parties not registered as users of the Court CM/ECF system accomplished via USPS mail.)
FILED IN THE
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for th _
Eastern District of Washington
)
)
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN, YOUTH, AND
)
FAMILIES; COURT APPOINTED SPECAL ADVOCATE; CHILD
PROTECTIVE SERVICES; FAMILY IMPACT NETWORK, a Washington )
Nonprofit Corporation; SERVICES ALTERNATIVES INC., a Washington )
SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK
Plaintiff
v.
Civil Action No.
Corporation; FRONTIER BEHAVIORIAL HEALTH, a Washington
Nonprofit Corporation; CARING HEARTS SOCIAL SERVICES, INC., a
Washington Nonprofit Corporation; and ENCOMPASSES FAMILY
SERVICES, LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company
Defendant
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
the plaintiff (name)
defendant (name)
interest at the rate of
recover from the
the amount of
), which includes prejudgment
% per annum, along with costs.
dollars ($
%, plus post judgment interest at the rate of
the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
.
other:
This action was (check one):
tried by a jury with Judge
rendered a verdict.
tried by Judge
was reached.
presiding, and the jury has
without a jury and the above decision
decided by Judge
Date:
CLERK OF COURT
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?