Durham et al v. Department of Children, Youth, and Families et al

Filing 29

JUDGMENT in favor of Caring Hearts Visitation Center, Child Protective Services, Court Appointed Special Advocate, Department of Children, Youth, and Families, Encompass Family Services, Family Impact Network, Frontier Behavior Health - Wraparound Intensive Services, Services Alternative against John-Michael Ray Durham, Penny June Shelton. (BM, Case Administrator) (Service of Notice on parties not registered as users of the Court CM/ECF system accomplished via USPS mail.)

Download PDF
FILED IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for th _ Eastern District of Washington ) ) WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN, YOUTH, AND ) FAMILIES; COURT APPOINTED SPECAL ADVOCATE; CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES; FAMILY IMPACT NETWORK, a Washington ) Nonprofit Corporation; SERVICES ALTERNATIVES INC., a Washington ) SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK Plaintiff v. Civil Action No. Corporation; FRONTIER BEHAVIORIAL HEALTH, a Washington Nonprofit Corporation; CARING HEARTS SOCIAL SERVICES, INC., a Washington Nonprofit Corporation; and ENCOMPASSES FAMILY SERVICES, LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company Defendant JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION The court has ordered that (check one): the plaintiff (name) defendant (name) interest at the rate of recover from the the amount of ), which includes prejudgment % per annum, along with costs. dollars ($ %, plus post judgment interest at the rate of the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name) recover costs from the plaintiff (name) . other: This action was (check one): tried by a jury with Judge rendered a verdict. tried by Judge was reached. presiding, and the jury has without a jury and the above decision decided by Judge Date: CLERK OF COURT Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?