Hinkley v. Shumate et al
Filing
12
JUDGMENT: IS ORDERED this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to comply with 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) regarding his bedding claims. See Vaden v. Summerhill, 449 F.3d 1047, 1050 (9th Cir. 2006); Brown v. Valoff, 422 F.3d 926, 934-35 ( 9th Cir. 2005). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED this action is DISMISSED forfailure to state a claim regarding hygiene and sanitation against the named Defendants for which relief may be granted under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) and 1915A (b)(1).(SMP, Case Administrator)
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for th _
Eastern District of Washington
JAMES HINKLEY,
Plaintiff
v.
ROD SHUMATE, BERNARD WARNER,
SCOTT FRANKS, STEVEN SINCLAIR and
RON KNIGHT,
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 4:14-cv-05029-EFS
Defendant
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
the plaintiff (name)
defendant (name)
interest at the rate of
recover from the
the amount of
), which includes prejudgment
% per annum, along with costs.
dollars ($
%, plus post judgment interest at the rate of
the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
.
✔ other:
IS ORDERED this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to comply with 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) regarding
his bedding claims. See Vaden v. Summerhill, 449 F.3d 1047, 1050 (9th Cir. 2006); Brown v. Valoff, 422 F.3d 926, 93435 (9th Cir. 2005). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED this action is DISMISSED forfailure to state a claim regarding hygiene
and sanitation against the named Defendants for which relief may be granted under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) and 1915A
(b)(1).
This action was (check one):
tried by a jury with Judge
rendered a verdict.
tried by Judge
was reached.
presiding, and the jury has
without a jury and the above decision
decided by Judge
Date: July 3, 2014
on a motion for
CLERK OF COURT
SEAN F. McAVOY
s/ Sheila Parpolia
Deputy Clerk
Sheila Parpolia
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?