Dugan v. Franklin County et al

Filing 51

AMENDED JUDGMENT in favor of Franklin County, Connie Rode, Ilene Alexander, Richard Lathim, Rick Long and against Lonnie Dugan. (SK, Case Administrator)

AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the_
Eastern District of Washington
Lonnie Dugan

Plaintiff

v.
Franklin County, et al

)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action No. 4:14-cv-05119-LRS

Defendant

AMENDED JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
’ the plaintiff (name)
defendant (name)
interest at the rate of

recover from the
the amount of
), which includes prejudgment
% per annum, along with costs.

dollars ($
%, plus post judgment interest at the rate of

’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
.
’ other:

This action was (check one):
’ tried by a jury with Judge
rendered a verdict.
’ tried by Judge
was reached.

presiding, and the jury has

without a jury and the above decision

Lonny R. Suko
’ decided by Judge
on a motion for
Summary Judgment by Defendants Alexander and Rode's, ECF No. 26, is GRANTED. Defendants Franklin County, Lathim and Long's
Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 23, is GRANTED IN PART. Plaintiff's federal claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Court
declines supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's remaining state law claims and they are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Date:

3/23/2016

CLERK OF COURT

SEAN F. McAVOY
s/ Shelly Koegler
(By) Deputy Clerk

Shelly Koegler