Campbell v. Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital

Filing 30

PROTECTIVE ORDER granting 29 Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Judge Rosanna Malouf Peterson. (AY, Case Administrator)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6 7 8 9 10 11 ALAN CAMPBELL, individually and as Mitchell Campbell’s grandfather, and his capacity as the Personal Representative for the Estate of Mitchell Campbell; DIANE CAMPBELL, individually and as Mitchell Campbell’s grandmother; and MC, the biological minor daughter of Mitchell Campbell, by and through a GAL to be named, 12 Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 v. OUR LADY OF LOURDES HOSPITAL AT PASCO, d/b/a Lourdes Medical Center; KEVIN S. OWENS, M.D., in his professional and individual capacity and his spouse, Jane Doe Owens; CITY OF PASCO; CITY OF PASCO POLICE DEPARTMENT; CITY OF PASCO CHIEF OF POLICE ROBERT METZGER, in his official capacity as well as his individual capacity, and his spouse Jane Doe Metzger, individually; CITY OF PASCO POLICE OFFICER ROBERT HARRIS, in his official capacity as well as his individual capacity, and his spouse Jane Doe PROTECTIVE ORDER ~ 1 NO: 4:16-CV-5048-RMP PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Harris, individually; CITY OF PASCO OFFICER MATT GRIFFIN, in his official capacity as well as his individual capacity, and his spouse Jane Doe Griffin; FRANKLIN COUNTY; FRANKLIN COUNTY SHERIFF RICHARD LATHIM, in his official capacity as well as his individual capacity, and his spouse Jane Doe Lathim; CAPTAIN RICK LONG, in his official capacity as well as his individual capacity, and his spouse Jane Doe Long; FRANKLIN COUNTY CORRECTIONS OFFICER JESSICA BROOKS, in her official capacity as well as her individual capacity, and her spouse John Doe Brooks; FRANKLIN COUNTY CORRECTIONS OFFICER YVETTE WILSON, in her official capacity as well as her individual capacity, and her spouse John Doe Wilson; and DOES 112, Defendants. 14 15 On September 15, 2016, the parties, by and through their attorneys, agreed 16 and stipulated pursuant to FRCP 29, to a protective order regarding certain 17 “Protected Documents.” Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 18 parties’ Stipulated Motion for Protective Order, ECF No. 29, is GRANTED. 19 20 The following provisions constitute the Protective Order regarding release of protected documents in this matter: 21 PROTECTIVE ORDER ~ 2 1 1. The parties shall not disclose or share any part of the “Protected 2 Documents” described below or any information gleaned from said documents with 3 any person except as expressly provided herein. 4 2. The Protected Documents covered by this Stipulation and the 5 subsequent Order of the court are described as follows: All files, personnel or 6 otherwise, maintained by the City of Pasco Police Department for officers Robert 7 Harris and Matt Griffin. 8 9 3. Prior to any disclosure of Protected Documents as described in this Order the parties shall obtain from each proposed recipient of the Protected 10 Documents their signature on a copy of the Protective Order that states that the 11 recipient has received a copy of the Protective Order regarding the Protected 12 Documents and agrees to be bound by such order. By signing a copy of the 13 Protective Order the recipient agrees that he or she has read the Order, represents 14 that he or she is a person permitted to have access to information from the Protected 15 Documents and agrees that he or she will make no further disclosure of the 16 information received, will personally protect the confidentiality of all copies and will 17 either return them to the producing parties’ attorneys at the conclusion of this case, 18 or will at that time personally destroy them and upon request from the producing 19 parties provide a sworn affidavit that he or she has done so. 20 21 PROTECTIVE ORDER ~ 3 1 4. Subject to the terms of this Order, the parties may allow inspection of 2 Protected Documents or discuss the contents of Protected Documents or information 3 therefrom with only the following categories of persons and no other: 4 5 a. investigators retained to assist in evaluation, preparation or testimony in this case; 6 7 b. 10 Any court personnel, court reporter, mediator, judge and or jury c. Any person identified as having authored or previously received in this case; 8 9 Duly licensed and professional experts, consultants or the material. 5. If it becomes necessary for any party to submit a Protected Document 11 to the court, that party shall inform the producing party with sufficient time prior to 12 the filing of the Protected Document such that a motion to seal the Protected 13 Document can be noted prior to filing. A motion to seal will not be granted unless 14 the motion and supporting documents establish compelling reasons to seal. 15 16 17 6. The parties shall use the Protected Documents or information obtained from them only for the purpose of prosecuting this litigation. 7. At the time of exchange of exhibit lists, the parties shall list in the 18 exhibit list for their case in chief any Protected Document they intend to use at the 19 time of trial by designating the exhibit as a “PROTECTED DOCUMENT” in capital 20 letters. Any other party may request an in camera review of the exhibit and make 21 PROTECTIVE ORDER ~ 4 1 the appropriate motion for the handling of the document at trial in accordance with 2 the Jury Trial Scheduling Order. 3 8. Nothing in this Protective Order shall limit any producing party’s use of 4 its own documents or prevent any producing party from disclosing its confidential 5 information to any person. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 9. The Court retains jurisdiction to make any amendments, modifications or additions to the Protective Order as it deems appropriate. 10. The parties, by stipulation, may add additional documents to be covered by this Order. This District Court Clerk in directed to enter this Order and provide copies to counsel. DATED this 15th day of September 2016. 13 14 s/ Rosanna Malouf Peterson ROSANNA MALOUF PETERSON United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 PROTECTIVE ORDER ~ 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?