Dukes v. Homan

Filing 11

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE - The court certifies any appeal of this dismissal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Rosanna Malouf Peterson. (LR, Case Administrator) **2 PAGES, PRINT ALL** (Timothy Dukes, Prisoner ID: 715503)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6 7 TIMOTHY DUKES, NO: 4:16-CV-5080-RMP Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 10 11 WASHINGTON STATE and MR. HOMAN ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE Defendants. 12 13 BEFORE THE COURT is Magistrate Judge John Rodgers’ Report and 14 Recommendation to dismiss the complaint without prejudice for failure to state a 15 claim upon which relief may be granted, ECF No. 9. Magistrate Judge Rodgers 16 specifically did not recommend that this dismissal count as one under 28 U.S.C. § 17 1915(g), as Plaintiff might be able to pursue an appropriate habeas remedy to 18 challenge state court criminal charges. 19 Plaintiff, a prisoner at the Washington State Penitentiary, is proceeding pro 20 se and in forma pauperis; Defendants have not been served in this action. There 21 being no objections, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, ECF ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE -- 1 1 No. 9, is ADOPTED in its entirety. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the 2 Complaint, ECF No. 7, is DISMISSED without prejudice. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Clerk is directed to enter this 4 Order, enter judgment, forward a copy to Plaintiff and close the file. The Court 5 certifies any appeal of this dismissal would not be taken in good faith. 6 7 8 DATED this 18th day of October 2016. s/ Rosanna Malouf Peterson ROSANNA MALOUF PETERSON United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE -- 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?