Grego v. Kadlec Regional Medical Center et al

Filing 59

JUDGMENT in favor of Cardon Healthcare Holdings, Cardon Healthcare Network LLC, and Kadlec Regional Medical Center against Andrew Grego, and Maria Doroshchuk. (LR, Case Administrator)

Download PDF
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for th _ Eastern District of Washington Dec 29, 2017 ANDREW GREGO and MARIA DOROSHCHUK, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. KADLEC REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, a Washington non-profit corporation, et al. FILED IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 4:16-CV-5150-RMP Defendant JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION The court has ordered that (check one): the plaintiff (name) defendant (name) recover from the the amount of ), which includes prejudgment % per annum, along with costs. dollars ($ %, plus post judgment interest at the rate of interest at the rate of the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name) recover costs from the plaintiff (name) . ✔ other: Defendant Kadlec's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 27) is GRANTED. The Cardon Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 32) is GRANTED. The Cardon Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 31) is DENIED AS MOOT. The Court dismisses all of Plaintiffs' claims against all Defendants with prejudice. Judgment is entered for the Defendants. This action was (check one): tried by a jury with Judge rendered a verdict. tried by Judge was reached. ✔ decided by Judge presiding, and the jury has without a jury and the above decision Rosanna Malouf Peterson on motions for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 27 and 32) and for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 31). Date: 12/29/2017 CLERK OF COURT SEAN F. McAVOY s/ Lennie Rasmussen Deputy Clerk Lennie Rasmussen

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?