Grego v. Kadlec Regional Medical Center et al
Filing
59
JUDGMENT in favor of Cardon Healthcare Holdings, Cardon Healthcare Network LLC, and Kadlec Regional Medical Center against Andrew Grego, and Maria Doroshchuk. (LR, Case Administrator)
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for th _
Eastern District of Washington
Dec 29, 2017
ANDREW GREGO and MARIA DOROSHCHUK,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff
v.
KADLEC REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, a
Washington non-profit corporation, et al.
FILED IN THE
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 4:16-CV-5150-RMP
Defendant
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
the plaintiff (name)
defendant (name)
recover from the
the amount of
), which includes prejudgment
% per annum, along with costs.
dollars ($
%, plus post judgment interest at the rate of
interest at the rate of
the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
.
✔ other:
Defendant Kadlec's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 27) is GRANTED. The Cardon Defendants' Motion for
Summary Judgment (ECF No. 32) is GRANTED. The Cardon Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF
No. 31) is DENIED AS MOOT. The Court dismisses all of Plaintiffs' claims against all Defendants with prejudice.
Judgment is entered for the Defendants.
This action was (check one):
tried by a jury with Judge
rendered a verdict.
tried by Judge
was reached.
✔ decided by Judge
presiding, and the jury has
without a jury and the above decision
Rosanna Malouf Peterson
on motions for
Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 27 and 32) and for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 31).
Date: 12/29/2017
CLERK OF COURT
SEAN F. McAVOY
s/ Lennie Rasmussen
Deputy Clerk
Lennie Rasmussen
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?