Hampton v. Durand et al

Filing 14

ORDER ADOPTING 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE - The court certifies any appeal of this dismissal would not be taken in good faith. Dismissed without prejudice. File CLOSED. Signed by Judge Salvador Mendoza, Jr. (SK, Case Administrator)

Download PDF
1 FILED IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 2 Nov 30, 2017 3 SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 5 6 7 8 TERRENZ RAY HAMPTON, a.k.a. TERRENZ RAY HAMPTON HENDERSON, Plaintiff, 9 vs. 10 11 12 NO: 4:17-CV-05005-SMJ ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE C/O DURAND, C/O KISSLER, C/O WEAVER, C/O RODGERS/ C/O QUARIN, C/O LESLIE, C/O HYOITT, C/O TAYLOR, and LUTHER THOMPSON, 13 Defendants. 14 15 BEFORE THE COURT is Magistrate Judge John Rodgers’s Report and 16 Recommendation to dismiss this action for failure to prosecute, ECF No. 12. 17 There being no objections, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED the Report and 18 Recommendation is ADOPTED in its entirety and this action is DISMISSED 19 without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41 (b), Federal Rules 20 of Civil Procedure. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE --1 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter this Order, 2 enter judgment, provide copies to Plaintiff at his last known address and CLOSE 3 the file. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal of 4 this Order would not be taken in good faith and would lack any arguable basis in 5 law or fact. 6 DATED this 30th day of November 2017. 7 8 __________________________ SALVADOR MENDOZA, JR. United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE --2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?