Sweet v. Employment Development Department et al

Filing 20

JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL in favor of Defendants. (PL, Case Administrator)

AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the_
Eastern District of Washington
WILLIAM R. SWEET,

Plaintiff

v.
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT;
JOSE DOE; CALIFORNIA STATE FRANCHISE TAX
BOARD; and DOES 1 to 100,

)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action No. 4:17-CV-5014-SMJ

Defendant

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
’ the plaintiff (name)
defendant (name)

recover from the
the amount of
), which includes prejudgment
% per annum, along with costs.

dollars ($
%, plus post judgment interest at the rate of

interest at the rate of

’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
.
’ other: Defendant California State Franchise Tax Board's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (ECF No. 6) is GRANTED.
Defendant Employment Development Department's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (ECF No. 7) is GRANTED.
Defendant Employment Development Department's Motion to Dismiss Complaint (ECF No. 5) is DENIED AS MOOT.
Judgment of Dismissal is entered in favor of Defendants.

This action was (check one):
’ tried by a jury with Judge
rendered a verdict.
’ tried by Judge
was reached.
’ decided by Judge

presiding, and the jury has

without a jury and the above decision
on Motions to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 6,

Salvador Mendoza, Jr.

7, and 5).

Date: June 5, 2017

CLERK OF COURT

SEAN F. McAVOY
s/ Penny Lamb
(By) Deputy Clerk

Penny Lamb