Telquist McMillen Clare PLLC v. Clare

Filing 47

ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT BENJAMIN DOW. Granting 39 Plaintiffs' Motion for Voluntary Dismissal of Defendant Benjamin Dow. Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant Benjamin Dow are DISMISSED with prejudice. Party Benjamin Dow (Individually) is terminated. Signed by Judge Stanley A Bastian. (SK, Case Administrator)

Download PDF
1 2 FILED IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 3 Nov 08, 2018 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 7 8 TELQUIST McMILLEN CLARE, PLLC, No. 4:18-cv-05045-SAB 9 a Washington Professional Limited 10 Liability Company, and ORDER DISMISSING 11 ANDREA CLARE, individually, DEFENDANT BENJAMIN DOW 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. 14 KEVIN P. CLARE, individually, and 15 BENJAMIN DOW, individually, 16 Defendants. 17 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Voluntary Dismissal of Defendant 18 Benjamin Dow, ECF No. 39. Plaintiffs inform the Court that they have resolved 19 their claims against Defendant Benjamin Dow and, therefore, request that he be 20 dismissed from this case. The Court finds good cause to grant Plaintiffs’ motion. 21 // 22 // 23 // 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 // ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT BENJAMIN DOW ^ 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 2 1. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Voluntary Dismissal of Defendant Benjamin Dow, 3 ECF No. 39, is GRANTED. 4 2. Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendant Benjamin Dow are DISMISSED 5 with prejudice. 6 3. Benjamin Dow is DISMISSED from this action. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court clerk is hereby directed to enter 8 this Order, provide copies to counsel, and STRIKE Defendant Benjamin Dow 9 from the case caption. 10 DATED this 8th day of November 2018. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Stanley A. Bastian United States District Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT BENJAMIN DOW ^ 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?