Waterbury et al v. Center for Excellence in Dermatology PLLC et al
Filing
15
ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT JANE DOE HOPP. The Parties Agreed Motion to Dismiss Defendant Jane Doe Hopp ECF No. 14 is GRANTED. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), Jane Doe Hopp is dismissed from this action. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice. (LLH, Courtroom Deputy)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
6
7
8
MELISSA WATERBURY,
DOUGLAS WATERBURY, and the
marital community comprised thereof,
Plaintiffs,
9
10
NO: 4:18-CV-5079-TOR
ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT
JANE DOE HOPP
v.
15
CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE IN
DERMATOLOGY, PLLC, a
Washington professional limited
liability company, and ROBERT B.
HOPP, M.D., JANE DOE HOPP, and
the marital community comprised
thereof,
Defendants.
BEFORE THE COURT is the Parties’ Agreed Motion to Dismiss Defendant
16
Jane Doe Hopp (ECF No. 14). The Court has reviewed the file and agreed motion,
17
and is fully informed.
11
12
13
14
18
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED:
19
1. The Parties Agreed Motion to Dismiss Defendant Jane Doe Hopp (ECF
20
No. 14) is GRANTED.
ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT JANE DOE HOPP ~ 1
1
2. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), Jane Doe Hopp is
2
dismissed from this action.
3
3. The Clerk of Court shall terminate Jane Doe Hopp from the docket.
4
The District Court Executive is directed to enter this Order and provide
5
6
copies to counsel.
DATED November 13, 2018.
7
8
9
THOMAS O. RICE
Chief United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT JANE DOE HOPP ~ 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?