Waterbury et al v. Center for Excellence in Dermatology PLLC et al

Filing 15

ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT JANE DOE HOPP. The Parties Agreed Motion to Dismiss Defendant Jane Doe Hopp ECF No. 14 is GRANTED. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), Jane Doe Hopp is dismissed from this action. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice. (LLH, Courtroom Deputy)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6 7 8 MELISSA WATERBURY, DOUGLAS WATERBURY, and the marital community comprised thereof, Plaintiffs, 9 10 NO: 4:18-CV-5079-TOR ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT JANE DOE HOPP v. 15 CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE IN DERMATOLOGY, PLLC, a Washington professional limited liability company, and ROBERT B. HOPP, M.D., JANE DOE HOPP, and the marital community comprised thereof, Defendants. BEFORE THE COURT is the Parties’ Agreed Motion to Dismiss Defendant 16 Jane Doe Hopp (ECF No. 14). The Court has reviewed the file and agreed motion, 17 and is fully informed. 11 12 13 14 18 ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED: 19 1. The Parties Agreed Motion to Dismiss Defendant Jane Doe Hopp (ECF 20 No. 14) is GRANTED. ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT JANE DOE HOPP ~ 1 1 2. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), Jane Doe Hopp is 2 dismissed from this action. 3 3. The Clerk of Court shall terminate Jane Doe Hopp from the docket. 4 The District Court Executive is directed to enter this Order and provide 5 6 copies to counsel. DATED November 13, 2018. 7 8 9 THOMAS O. RICE Chief United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT JANE DOE HOPP ~ 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?