Yam v. Providence Health & Services
Filing
24
JUDGMENT of Dismissal with Prejudice. (AY, Case Administrator)
Case 4:20-cv-05004-SMJ
ECF No. 24
filed 05/04/22
PageID.131 Page 1 of 1
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the_
Eastern District of Washington
United States ex. rel. DAVID YAM,
M.D., DAVID YAM, M.D., an
individual,
Relators -Plaintiffs
v.
PROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES, a Washington
non-profit corporation d/b/a PROVIDENCE ST. MARY
MEDICAL CENTER,
FILED IN THE
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
May 04, 2022
)
)
)
)
)
SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK
Civil Action No. 4:20-cv-05004-SMJ
Defendant
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
’ the plaintiff (name)
defendant (name)
recover from the
the amount of
), which includes prejudgment
% per annum, along with costs.
dollars ($
%, plus post judgment interest at the rate of
interest at the rate of
’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
.
’ other: Relator-Plaintiff’s Amended Stipulation and Order Dismissing Plaintiff’s Claims Against Defendant Providence Health
Services with Prejudice (ECF No. 22) is GRANTED.
Relator-Plaintiff’s Stipulation and Order Dismissing Plaintiff’s Claims Against Defendant Providence Health Services
with Prejudice (ECF No. 21) is DENIED AS MOOT.
All claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to bear their own costs and fees.
This action was (check one):
’ tried by a jury with Judge
rendered a verdict.
’ tried by Judge
was reached.
’ decided by Judge
presiding, and the jury has
without a jury and the above decision
on a stipulated motion for
SALVADOR MENDOZA, JR.
dismissal.
Date: 05/04/2022
CLERK OF COURT
SEAN F. McAVOY
s/ Allison Yates
(By) Deputy Clerk
Allison Yates
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?