Yam v. Providence Health & Services

Filing 24

JUDGMENT of Dismissal with Prejudice. (AY, Case Administrator)

Download PDF
Case 4:20-cv-05004-SMJ ECF No. 24 filed 05/04/22 PageID.131 Page 1 of 1 AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the_ Eastern District of Washington United States ex. rel. DAVID YAM, M.D., DAVID YAM, M.D., an individual, Relators -Plaintiffs v. PROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES, a Washington non-profit corporation d/b/a PROVIDENCE ST. MARY MEDICAL CENTER, FILED IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON May 04, 2022 ) ) ) ) ) SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK Civil Action No. 4:20-cv-05004-SMJ Defendant JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION The court has ordered that (check one): ’ the plaintiff (name) defendant (name) recover from the the amount of ), which includes prejudgment % per annum, along with costs. dollars ($ %, plus post judgment interest at the rate of interest at the rate of ’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name) recover costs from the plaintiff (name) . ’ other: Relator-Plaintiff’s Amended Stipulation and Order Dismissing Plaintiff’s Claims Against Defendant Providence Health Services with Prejudice (ECF No. 22) is GRANTED. Relator-Plaintiff’s Stipulation and Order Dismissing Plaintiff’s Claims Against Defendant Providence Health Services with Prejudice (ECF No. 21) is DENIED AS MOOT. All claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to bear their own costs and fees. This action was (check one): ’ tried by a jury with Judge rendered a verdict. ’ tried by Judge was reached. ’ decided by Judge presiding, and the jury has without a jury and the above decision on a stipulated motion for SALVADOR MENDOZA, JR. dismissal. Date: 05/04/2022 CLERK OF COURT SEAN F. McAVOY s/ Allison Yates (By) Deputy Clerk Allison Yates

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?