New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC dba AT&T Mobility v. City of Walla Walla

Filing 70

ORDER DENYING 69 PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Chief Judge Stanley A Bastian. (LTR, Case Administrator)

Download PDF
1 2 FILED IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 3 Jun 04, 2024 4 SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 9 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, 10 LLC, D/B/A AT&T MOBILITY, a No. 4:23-CV-05162-SAB 11 Delaware limited liability company, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING 13 v. PROTECTIVE ORDER 14 CITY OF WALLA WALLA, Defendant, 15 16 BARBARA AND EVERETT KNUDSON, Intervenors. 17 18 19 Before the Court is the parties’ Stipulated Protective Order, ECF No. 69. 20 The motion was considered without oral argument. 21 The parties ask the Court to sign a Protective Order that was drafted and 22 agreed to by the parties. It is this Court’s practice to not enter general Protective 23 Orders that simply set forth the parties’ agreement for handling “confidential” 24 materials. 25 The parties are free to contract between themselves regarding disclosure of 26 information produced in discovery and pursue appropriate remedies in the event of 27 breach; however, the Court will not be party to such an agreement. If, in the future, 28 the parties wish to file specific items of discovery in the court record and protect ORDER DENYING PROTECTIVE ORDER # 1 1 such items from public access, the Court will entertain an application for a 2 narrowly tailored protective order. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 4 1. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Executive is hereby directed to The parties’ Stipulated Protective Order, ECF No. 69, is DENIED. 6 file this Order and provide copies to counsel. 7 DATED this 4th day of June 2024. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Stanley A. Bastian Chief United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER DENYING PROTECTIVE ORDER # 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?