R.K. v. Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, et al
Filing
23
REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER: Jury Trial reset for 4/10/2006 09:00 AM before Hon. Ricardo Martinez. Joinder of Parties due by 3/18/2005; Expert Witness Disclosure/Reports under FRCP 26(a)(2) due by 9/7/2005; Motions due by 10/7/2005; Discovery completed by 10/31/2005; Dispositive motions due by 11/30/2005; 39.1 Mediation to be completed by 5/27/2005; Motions in Limine due by 3/13/2006; Pretrial Order due by 3/29/2006; Trial briefs and exhibits to be submitted by 4/5/2006; Proposed voir dire/jury instructions due by 4/5/2006; Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law to be submitted by 4/5/2006 by Judge Ricardo Martinez. (LW)
<![CDATA[
R.K. v. Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, et al
Doc. 23
Case 2:04-cv-02338-RSM
Document 23
Filed 03/10/2005
Page 1 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 REVISED ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATE & RELATED DATES - 1 v. THE CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, a Utah Corporation sole, a/k/a "MORMON CHURCH," LDS SOCIAL SERVICES a/k/a LDS FAMILY SERVICES, a Utah corporation, Defendants. Upon the written request of counsel, the pretrial and trial schedule is amended as follows: TRIAL DATE Deadline for joining additional parties Reports from expert witnesses under FRCP 26(a)(2) due All motions related to discovery must be filed by and noted on the motion calendar no later than the third Friday thereafter (see CR7(d)) Discovery completed by All dispositive motions must be filed by and noted on the motion calendar no later than the fourth Friday thereafter (see CR 7(d)) Mediation per CR 39.1(c)(3) held no later than All motions in limine must be filed by and noted on the motion calendar no later than the second Friday thereafter April 10, 2006 March 18, 2005 September 7, 2005 October 7, 2005 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE KENNETH FLEMING AND JOHN DOE, Plaintiffs, Case No. C04-2338RSM REVISED ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATE & RELATED DATES
October 31, 2005 November 30, 2005
May 27, 2005 March 13, 2006
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:04-cv-02338-RSM
Document 23
Filed 03/10/2005
Page 2 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Agreed pretrial order due Pretrial conference Trial briefs, proposed voir dire questions, jury instructions and proposed findings of fact & conclusions of law due Length of Trial: 4-5 weeks
March 29, 2006 To be scheduled by the Court April 5, 2006 Jury XXX
These dates are set at the direction of the Court after reviewing the joint status report and discovery plan submitted by the parties. All other dates are specified in the Local Civil Rules. If any of the dates identified in this Order or the Local Civil Rules fall on a weekend or federal holiday, the act or event shall be performed on the next business day. These are firm dates that can be changed only by order of the Court, not by agreement of counsel or the parties. The Court will alter these dates only upon good cause shown: failure to complete discovery within the time allowed is not recognized as good cause. If the trial date assigned to this matter creates an irreconcilable conflict, counsel must notify the Deputy Clerk, Lowell Williams or Laurie Cuaresma, in writing within 10 days of the date of this Order and must set forth the exact nature of the conflict. A failure to do so will be deemed a waiver. Counsel must be prepared to begin trial on the date scheduled, but it should be understood that the trial may have to await the completion of other cases. COOPERATION: As required by CR 37(a), all discovery matters are to be resolved by agreement if possible. Counsel are further directed to cooperate in preparing the final pretrial order in the format required by CR 16.1, except as ordered below. EXHIBITS: The original and one copy of the trial exhibits are to be delivered to chambers five days before the trial date. Each exhibit shall be clearly marked. Exhibit tags are available in the Clerk's Office. The Court hereby alters the CR 16.1 procedure for numbering exhibits: plaintiff's exhibits shall be numbered consecutively beginning with 1; defendant's exhibits shall
REVISED ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATE & RELATED DATES - 2
Case 2:04-cv-02338-RSM
Document 23
Filed 03/10/2005
Page 3 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
be numbered consecutively beginning with the next number not used by plaintiff. Duplicate documents shall not be listed twice: once a party has identified an exhibit in the pretrial order, any party may use it. Each set of exhibits shall be submitted in a three-ring binder with appropriately numbered tabs. SETTLEMENT: Should this case settle, counsel shall notify Lowell Williams or Laurie Cuaresma as soon as possible at 206-370-8521. Pursuant to GR 3(b), an attorney who fails to give the Deputy Clerk prompt notice of settlement may be subject to such discipline as the Court deems appropriate. DATED this 10th day of March, 2005.
/s/ Ricardo S. Martinez Ricardo S. Martinez United States District Judge
ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATE & RELATED DATES - 3
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
