United States of America et al v. Center For Diagnostic Imaging Inc et al

Filing 151

ORDER by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. The court DENIES dft Center for Diagnostic Imaging Inc.'s 148 motion for an extensions of page limit, and Pltfs Alexander Serra and Patricia West's 149 motion for leave to file excess pages. (CL)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel., et al., Plaintiffs/Relators, 10 11 12 13 Case No. C05-0058RSL v. CENTER FOR DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING, INC., et al., ORDER DENYING AS MOOT MOTIONS TO FILE EXCESS PAGES Defendants. 14 15 16 This matter comes before the Court on defendant’s motion “for an extension of 17 the page limit, if applicable.” On August 19, 2011, defendant filed a twenty-two page 18 motion to dismiss and for sanctions. (Dkt. #147). Because that motion seeks dispositive 19 relief, the dismissal of certain allegations and claims, defendant was entitled to file a 20 memorandum of up to twenty-four pages in length pursuant to Local Rule 7. The 21 memorandum it filed did not exceed the page limit, so the motion for an extension of the 22 page limit (Dkt. #148) is DENIED as moot. Similarly, plaintiffs’ motion to file an 23 overlength response of up to twenty-four pages is DENIED (Dkt. #149) as moot. In the 24 future, counsel are urged to resolve these matters amicably without the Court’s 25 26 ORDER DENYING MOTIONS - 1 1 involvement. 2 3 DATED this 30th day of August, 2011. 4 5 6 A Robert S. Lasnik 7 United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER DENYING MOTIONS - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?