United States of America et al v. Center For Diagnostic Imaging Inc et al
Filing
151
ORDER by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. The court DENIES dft Center for Diagnostic Imaging Inc.'s 148 motion for an extensions of page limit, and Pltfs Alexander Serra and Patricia West's 149 motion for leave to file excess pages. (CL)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex
rel., et al.,
Plaintiffs/Relators,
10
11
12
13
Case No. C05-0058RSL
v.
CENTER FOR DIAGNOSTIC
IMAGING, INC., et al.,
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT
MOTIONS TO FILE EXCESS
PAGES
Defendants.
14
15
16
This matter comes before the Court on defendant’s motion “for an extension of
17
the page limit, if applicable.” On August 19, 2011, defendant filed a twenty-two page
18
motion to dismiss and for sanctions. (Dkt. #147). Because that motion seeks dispositive
19
relief, the dismissal of certain allegations and claims, defendant was entitled to file a
20
memorandum of up to twenty-four pages in length pursuant to Local Rule 7. The
21
memorandum it filed did not exceed the page limit, so the motion for an extension of the
22
page limit (Dkt. #148) is DENIED as moot. Similarly, plaintiffs’ motion to file an
23
overlength response of up to twenty-four pages is DENIED (Dkt. #149) as moot. In the
24
future, counsel are urged to resolve these matters amicably without the Court’s
25
26
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS - 1
1
involvement.
2
3
DATED this 30th day of August, 2011.
4
5
6
A
Robert S. Lasnik
7
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?