Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al

Filing 110

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER Re Mediation Deadline by parties. (Siegel, Robert)

Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al

Doc. 110

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC

Document 110

Filed 02/21/2007

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION v. VIRTUMUNDO, INC., a Delaware corporation d/b/a ADKNOWLEDGEMAIL.COM; ADKNOWLEDGE, INC., a Delaware corporation, d/b/a ADKNOWLEDGEMAIL.COM; SCOTT LYNN, an individual; and JOHN DOES, 1-X, Defendants. JAMES S. GORDON, Jr., a married individual, d/b/a GORDONWORKS.COM'; OMNI INNOVATIONS, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, Plaintiffs,

The Honorable John C. Coughenour

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE No. CV06-0204JCC STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STRIKE MEDIATION DEADLINE

Plaintiffs JAMES S. GORDON, Jr. and OMNI INNOVATIONS, LLC (together, "Plaintiffs"), on the one hand, and Defendants VIRTUMUNDO, INC., ADKNOWLEDGE, INC., and SCOTT LYNN (collectively, "Defendants"), on the other hand, hereby stipulate and respectfully request the Court strike the current deadline for Rule 39.1 mediation set in the above-captioned action, pending the outcome of the parties' respective motions for summary judgment, namely Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STRIKE MEDIATION DEADLINE - 1 (CV06-0204JCC)

NEWMAN & NEWMAN, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP

505 Fifth Ave. S., Ste. 610 Seattle, Washington 98104 [phone]

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC

t Document EdipedightFiled PDF Editor 110 by Foxit 02/21/2007 Company, 2004 Page 2 of 2 Co yr (c) by Foxit Software For Evaluation Only.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 53) and Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 98). The parties believe mediation in the above-captioned matter is more likely to be successful after the Court rules on the pending cross-motions for summary judgment. Consequently, the parties jointly request the current mediation deadline be stricken. The parties request the Court reset the Rule 39.1 mediation deadline for a date which is thirty (30) calendar days after this Court issues its order on Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment or Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, whichever is later. DATED this ______ day of February, 2007. NEWMAN & NEWMAN, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP By: Derek A. Newman, WSBA No. 26967 Roger M. Townsend, WSBA No. 25525 Attorneys for Defendants ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Rule 39.1 mediation deadline set in the above-captioned action is stricken. The new Rule 39.1 mediation deadline is the date which is thirty (30) calendar days after this Court issues its order on Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment or Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, whichever is later. DATED this____ day of _________________, 2007. iJUSTICE LAW, PC

By: /s/ Robert J. Siegel Robert J. Siegel, WSBA No. 17312 Attorneys for Plaintiffs

JOHN C. COUGHENOUR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STRIKE MEDIATION DEADLINE - 2 (CV06-0204JCC)

NEWMAN & NEWMAN, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP

505 Fifth Ave. S., Ste. 610 Seattle, Washington 98104 [phone]