Amiga Inc v. Hyperion VOF

Filing 74

PROPOSED ORDER (Unsigned) re 71 MOTION to Dismiss or in the alternative, Transfer. (Cock, Lawrence)

Download PDF
Amiga Inc v. Hyperion VOF Doc. 74 Case 2:07-cv-00631-RSM Document 74 Filed 11/08/2007 Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING HYPERION VOF'S CLAIMS AGAINST ITEC, LLC - 1 Case No. CV07-0631RSM THE HON. RICARDO MARTINEZ Noted for Hearing: November 30, 2007 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE AMIGA, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, and HYPERION VOF, a Belgium corporation, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff, v. ITEC, LLC, a New York Limited Liability Company, Counterclaim Defendant. CAUSE NO. CV07-0631RSM [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING HYPERION VOF'S CLAIMS AGAINST ITEC, LLC THIS MATTER came on regularly before this Court on Crossclaim Defendant Itec, LLC's Motion To Dismiss Or, In The Alternative, To Transfer. The Court has reviewed the following documents: CABLE, LANGENBACH, KINERK & BAUER, LLP SUITE 3500 1000 SECOND AVENUE BUILDING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 981041048 (206) 292-8800 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:07-cv-00631-RSM Document 74 Filed 11/08/2007 Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1) Notice of Motion And Motion; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support Of Motion To Dismiss Or, In The Alternative, To Transfer; 2) The Declaration of Lance Gothoffer, with exhibits thereto; 3) The Declaration of Jeff Grzymala, with exhibits thereto; 4) Hyperion's opposition to Itec, LLC's Motion To Dismiss, Or In the Alternative To Transfer, if any; 5) Itec, LLC's reply in support of Motion To Dismiss Or, In The Alternative, To Transfer, if any; and 6) The records and files herein. The Court has heard arguments of counsel and deems itself fully apprised. NOW THEREFORE it is hereby: ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Itec, LLC's Motion To Dismiss Or, In The Alternative, To Transfer, is GRANTED and all claims brought by Hyperion, VOF against Itec, LLC are DISMISSED. DONE IN OPEN COURT this day of _________, 2007. THE HONORABLE RICHARD MARTINEZ [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING HYPERION VOF'S CLAIMS AGAINST ITEC, LLC - 2 Case No. CV07-0631RSM CABLE, LANGENBACH, KINERK & BAUER, LLP SUITE 3500 1000 SECOND AVENUE BUILDING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 981041048 (206) 292-8800 Case 2:07-cv-00631-RSM Document 74 Filed 11/08/2007 Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Presented by: CABLE, LANGENBACH, KINERK & BAUER, LLP By: /s/ Lawrence R. Cock, WSBA No. 20326 CABLE, LANGENBACH, KINERK & BAUER, LLP Suite 3500, 1000 Second Avenue Building Seattle, Washington 98104-1048 (206) 292-8800 phone (206) 292-0494 facsimile lrc@cablelang.com Attorneys for Counterclaim Defendant ITEC, LLC [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING HYPERION VOF'S CLAIMS AGAINST ITEC, LLC - 3 Case No. CV07-0631RSM CABLE, LANGENBACH, KINERK & BAUER, LLP SUITE 3500 1000 SECOND AVENUE BUILDING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 981041048 (206) 292-8800 Case 2:07-cv-00631-RSM Document 74 Filed 11/08/2007 Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on November 8, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following: William A. Kinsel Law Offices of William A. Kinsel, PLLC Market Place Tower 2025 First Avenue, Suite 440 Seattle, WA 98121 A copy was also served by hand delivery on November 8, 2007. /s/ Lawrence R. Cock, WSBA No. 20326 Attorney for Plaintiff Amiga, Inc. CABLE, LANGENBACH, KINERK & BAUER, LLP Suite 3500, 1000 Second Avenue Building Seattle, Washington 98104-1048 (206) 292-8800 phone (206) 292-0494 facsimile lrc@cablelang.com [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING HYPERION VOF'S CLAIMS AGAINST ITEC, LLC - 4 Case No. CV07-0631RSM CABLE, LANGENBACH, KINERK & BAUER, LLP SUITE 3500 1000 SECOND AVENUE BUILDING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 981041048 (206) 292-8800

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?