Amiga Inc v. Hyperion VOF
Filing
83
PROPOSED ORDER (Unsigned) re 81 MOTION for Leave To Amend Its Complaint (Cock, Lawrence)
Amiga Inc v. Hyperion VOF
Doc. 83
Case 2:07-cv-00631-RSM
Document 83
Filed 12/12/2007
Page 1 of 4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 v. ITEC, LLC, a New York Limited Liability Company, Counterclaim Defendant. and HYPERION VOF, a Belgium corporation, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff,
THE HON. RICARDO MARTINEZ Noted for Hearing: December 21, 2007
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE AMIGA, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, CAUSE NO. CV07-0631RSM [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF AMIGA, INC.'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND ITS COMPLAINT
THIS MATTER came on regularly before this Court on Plaintiff Amiga, Inc.'s Motion For Leave To Amend Its Complaint. The Court has reviewed the following documents: 1) Plaintiff Amiga, Inc.'s Motion For Leave To Amend Its Complaint;
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF AMIGA, INC.'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND ITS COMPLAINT - 1 Case No. CV07-0631RSM
CABLE, LANGENBACH, KINERK & BAUER, LLP
SUITE 3500 1000 SECOND AVENUE BUILDING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 981041048 (206) 292-8800
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:07-cv-00631-RSM
Document 83
Filed 12/12/2007
Page 2 of 4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
2) Hyperion's opposition to Plaintiff Amiga, Inc.'s Motion For Leave To Amend Its Complaint, if any; 3) Amiga, Inc.'s reply to Hyperion's opposition to Plaintiff Amiga, Inc.'s Motion For Leave To Amend Its Complaint, if any; and 4) The records and files herein. The Court deems itself fully apprised. NOW THEREFORE it is hereby: ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff Amiga, Inc.'s Motion For Leave To Amend Its Complaint is GRANTED. The Amended Complaint shall be filed within two weeks of the date of this Order. DONE IN OPEN COURT this day of _________, 2007.
THE HONORABLE RICARDO MARTINEZ
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF AMIGA, INC.'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND ITS COMPLAINT - 2 Case No. CV07-0631RSM
CABLE, LANGENBACH, KINERK & BAUER, LLP
SUITE 3500 1000 SECOND AVENUE BUILDING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 981041048 (206) 292-8800
Case 2:07-cv-00631-RSM
Document 83
Filed 12/12/2007
Page 3 of 4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Presented by: CABLE, LANGENBACH, KINERK & BAUER, LLP By: /s/ Lawrence R. Cock Lawrence R. Cock, WSBA No. 20326 CABLE, LANGENBACH, KINERK & BAUER, LLP Suite 3500, 1000 Second Avenue Building Seattle, Washington 98104-1048 (206) 292-8800 phone (206) 292-0494 facsimile lrc@cablelang.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Amiga, Inc.
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF AMIGA, INC.'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND ITS COMPLAINT - 3 Case No. CV07-0631RSM
CABLE, LANGENBACH, KINERK & BAUER, LLP
SUITE 3500 1000 SECOND AVENUE BUILDING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 981041048 (206) 292-8800
Case 2:07-cv-00631-RSM
Document 83
Filed 12/12/2007
Page 4 of 4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on December 12, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following: William A. Kinsel Law Offices of William A. Kinsel, PLLC Market Place Tower 2025 First Avenue, Suite 440 Seattle, WA 98121 A copy was also served by hand delivery on November 8, 2007.
/s/ Lawrence R. Cock Lawrence R. Cock, WSBA No. 20326 Attorney for Plaintiff Amiga, Inc. CABLE, LANGENBACH, KINERK & BAUER, LLP Suite 3500, 1000 Second Avenue Building Seattle, Washington 98104-1048 (206) 292-8800 phone (206) 292-0494 facsimile lrc@cablelang.com
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF AMIGA, INC.'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND ITS COMPLAINT - 4 Case No. CV07-0631RSM
CABLE, LANGENBACH, KINERK & BAUER, LLP
SUITE 3500 1000 SECOND AVENUE BUILDING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 981041048 (206) 292-8800
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?