Parks v. Tulalip Resort Casino
Filing
4
ORDER granting 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Judge James P. Donohue.(RS, )
Parks v. Tulalip Resort Casino
Doc. 4
Case 2:07-cv-01406-RSM
Document 4
Filed 09/14/2007
Page 1 of 2
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE JAMES CORNELL PARKS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) TULALIP RESORT CASINO, ) ) Defendant. ) _____________________________________ ) Case No. C07-1406-RSM-JPD
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
Plaintiff James Cornell Parks is proceeding pro se in his attempt to bring an
16 employment discrimination lawsuit against the Tulalip Resort Casino. Dkt. No. 1-1. The 17 present matter comes before the Court on plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis 18 ("IFP"). Dkt. No. 1. After careful consideration of plaintiff's IFP application, the governing 19 law, and the balance of the record, the Court ORDERS as follows: 20 ( 1) Plaintiff's application to proceed IFP (Dkt. No. 1) is GRANTED. Plaintiff does
21 not appear to have funds available to afford the $350.00 filing fee. 22 (2) The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this Order to plaintiff and to
23 issue summonses to plaintiff to enable proper service of the complaint on the appropriate 24 parties. Plaintiff shall note that it is his and/or his attorney's responsibility to properly 25 serve copies of the complaint along with appropriate summonses as required by Rule 4 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:07-cv-01406-RSM
Document 4
Filed 09/14/2007
Page 2 of 2
01
(3)
The Clerk is further directed to send a copy of this order to the plaintiff and to
02 the Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez. 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 DATED this 14th day of September, 2007.
A
JAMES P. DONOHUE United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?