Armbruster v. CellCyte Genetics Corporation et al

Filing 138

ORDER granting pltf's 134 Motion to Deny Motions to Dismiss as Moot; The motions to dismiss 115 , 116 , 117 , 120 are denied as moot, without prejudice. Dfts may refile motions to dismiss after pltfs file their second amended consolidated complaint, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(VP)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER GRANTING MOTION - 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE In re CELLCYTE GENETICS SECURITIES LITIGATION This order relates to: All Actions Case No. C08-47RSL ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DENY MOTIONS TO DISMISS AS MOOT This matter comes before the Court on plaintiffs' motion to continue and/or deny as moot defendants' pending motions to dismiss. Defendants do not oppose the motion. Plaintiffs' motion seeks an order continuing the motions to dismiss until after the Court rules on plaintiffs' pending motion to amend their complaint. An order continuing the motions is unnecessary because the Court has granted plaintiffs' motion to amend. Defendants' pending motions to dismiss are directed towards the first amended consolidated complaint, but that complaint has been superceded by amendment. Accordingly, the pending motions to dismiss are moot. The Court therefore GRANTS plaintiffs' motion to deny defendants' motions to dismiss as moot (Dkt. #134). The motions to dismiss (Dkt. ## 115, 116, 117, 120) are denied as moot. The denial is without prejudice; defendants may refile motions to dismiss after plaintiffs file their 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 second amended consolidated complaint in the docket. DATED this 20th day of January, 2009. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge ORDER GRANTING MOTION - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?