Khadera et al v. ABM Industries Incorporated et al

Filing 184

ORDER denying 183 Defendants' motion to approve production of redacted electronic documents in TIFF format. Defendants must provide the documents in NSF native form within three (3) business days of this Order, by Judge Marsha J. Pechman.(RK)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 v. ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED, AMERICAN BUILDING MAINTENANCE CO. ­ WEST, and DOES I through X, inclusive, Defendants. This matter came before the Court on Defendants' Revised Motion to Approve Production of Redacted Electronic Documents in TIFF Format. (Dkt. No. 183.) The Court has reviewed the Local Rule CR 37 Joint Submission Regarding Defendants' Motion and all materials submitted in support of and in opposition to the Motion. Defendants' Motion is hereby DENIED. As provided in the Court's previous Order, Defendants must provide the documents in ".NSF" native form. (See Dkt. No. 168.) Defendants must complete the disputed production within three (3) business days of this Order. The Court directs the Clerk to transmit a copy of this Order to all counsel of record. DATED this 13th day of August, 2009. YEDIDA KHADERA, KEVIN HUDSON & SAM RICHARDSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, Case No. C08-0417 MJP ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO APPROVE PRODUCTION OF REDACTED ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS IN TIFF FORMAT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE Marsha J. Pechman United States District Judge ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO APPROVE PRODUCTION OF REDACTED ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS IN TIFF FORMAT - 1 Case No. C08-0417 MJP A

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?