Rodolf v. Kieland, et al
Filing
60
ORDER denying plaintiff's 48 Motion to supplement; JSR order is vacated by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(RS) cc R Rodolf
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE RICHARD C. RODOLF, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER KIELAND, et al., Defendant.
NO. C08-475RSL ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT
This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff's "Motion to Supplement," Dkt. #48. Although defendants logically construed this motion as a motion to compel the production of evidence, Dkt. #49 at 1, plaintiff clarified in his reply brief that he "is not asking discovery," Dkt. #53 at 18, and only asks that the documents he has provided "will be admissible evidence as it comes in to support [his] claim to help the Court come to a conclusion in this matter," id. at 19. However, as there is no pending dispositive motion before the Court, there is nothing for plaintiff to supplement. On May 15, 2009, the Court adopted United States Magistrate Judge Mary Alice Theiler's Report and Recommendation denying summary judgment as to defendants Kieland, Micic, and Connelly. Therefore, unless the parties agree on a settlement at any point,
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
plaintiff's claims against these defendants will go forward to trial. At trial, plaintiff may offer into evidence any documents or exhibits in support of his claim. The Court will determine the admissibility of each piece of evidence at that time. The Court, therefore, DENIES plaintiff's motion to supplement (Dkt. # 48). The Court further VACATES its Order Regarding Initial Disclosures, Joint Status Report, and Early Settlement (Dkt. #59). The Court will issue a case scheduling order to arrange a trial date.
DATED this 22nd day of May, 2009.
A
Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT 2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
