Reule v. H.O. Seiffert Company et al
Filing
44
ORDER denying 43 Motion for leave to file a surreply by Judge Marsha J. Pechman.(MD, mailed copy of order to pltf)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's motion to for leave to file a surreply. (Dkt. No. 43.) Pursuant to Local Rule 7(g), surreplies are only permitted for motions to strike material filed with a party's reply brief. It does not appear as if Plaintiff's proposed surreply contains any motion to strike. The rules also provide that surreplies shall not exceed three pages and Plaintiff's proposed surreply is 13 pages long. CR 7(g)(3). The Court DENIES Plaintiff's request for leave to file a surreply. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to all counsel of record and mail a copy to Plaintiff. DATED this 28th day of May, 2009. vs. THE H.O. SEIFFERT COMPANY dba EDS EVERETT DOWNTOWN STORAGE, et al., Defendants. CHRISTINE E. REULE, Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO FILE A SURREPLY Case No. C08-1591 MJP UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Marsha J. Pechman United States District Judge
ORDER - 1
A
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
