Dargan v. Nodus

Filing 33

ORDER VACATING 26 Order to Show Cause (Nodus). The Order to Show Cause is hereby vacated in light of defendant's response and receipt of the courtesy copy, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (VP)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
ORDER VACATING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE _______________________________________ ) MARGARET E. DARGAN, a single person ) and resident of the State of Oregon,, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) GARY V. INGRAM, a Washington resident ) individually, PAMELA M. NODUS, a ) Washington resident individually, and the ) marital community of GARY V. INGRAM and ) PAMELA M. NODUS ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________________)

No. C08-1714RSL ORDER VACATING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. On March 23, 2009, defendant Nodus filed a response to plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction that, taken as a whole, exceeded 50 pages in length but did not provide a copy for chambers. The Court ordered defendant to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for defendant's failure to comply with a previous Court order. The Order to Show Cause (Dkt. #26) is hereby VACATED in light of defendant's response and receipt of the courtesy copy.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

DATED this 30th day of March, 2009.

A

Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

ORDER VACATING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

-2-