Dargan v. Nodus

Filing 89

STIPULATION AND ORDER requesting mediation by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (RS)

Download PDF
HONORABLE ROBERT S. LASNIK 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 MARGARET E. DARGAN, a single person and resident of the state of Oregon, 11 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, v. NO. 2:08-CV-01714-RSL STIPULATION REQUESTING MEDIATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL CIVIL RULE 39.1(C) GARY V. INGRAM, a Washington resident, individually; PAMELA M. NODUS, a Washington resident, individually; and the marital community of GARY V. INGRAM and PAMELA M. NODUS, Defendants. 17 18 19 The parties, Plaintiff Margaret E. Dargan, and Defendant Gary V. Ingram, stipulate to the 20 entry of an order directing the parties to engage in mediation pursuant to Local Civil Rule 21 39.1(c) as follows: 22 23 24 25 1. On November 26, 2008, Plaintiff filed a complaint for enforcement of victim’s rights and declaratory and injunctive relief. Dkt. No. 1. 2. On August 6, 2009, the Court entered orders (a) of final judgment in favor of Plaintiff, Dkt. No. 71, and (b) dismissing the case, Dkt. No. 72. 26 STIPULATION REQUESTING MEDIATION - 1 {03263897.DOCX;1 } CAIRNCROSS & HEMPELMANN, P.S. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 524 Second Avenue, Suite 500 Seattle, Washington 98104-2323 office 206 587 0700 fax 206 587 2308 1 3. On July 14, 2016, Plaintiff moved the Court for an order (a) reopening this case 2 and (b) declaring Defendant Gary Ingram to be in default of judgment (the “Default Motion”). 3 Dkt. No. 73. 4 4. On November 15, 2016, the Court granted in part the Default Motion; 5 specifically, the Court reopened this case but refrained from finding the Defendant to be in 6 default. Dkt. No. 85. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 5. On the same day, the Court entered an amended order setting trial and related dates. Dkt. No. 86. 6. At the November 15, 2016 hearing on the Default Motion, the Court expressed its opinion that the parties should avail themselves of alternative dispute resolution. 7. The parties have attempted to come to a negotiated resolution without the assistance of a mediator, but have been unable to do so. 8. Local Civil Rule 39.1(c) provides that the Court may order the parties to engage 14 in mediation and that the parties may file a stipulation for mediation at any time. Local Rules 15 W.D. Wash. LCR 39.1(c)(1). 16 9. Additionally, the parties may jointly request pro bono mediation. Local Rules 17 W.D. Wash. LCR 39.1(c)(4). Attached hereto as Exhibit A is the parties’ completed Request for 18 Mediation Without Charge. 19 10. Mrs. Dargan has already been damaged financially by the original crime 20 perpetrated by Mr. Ingram, and also in the expense of pursuing restitution from Mr. Ingram. 21 Additionally, the expenses Mr. Ingram incurs defending against Mrs. Dargan’s claim may 22 potentially divert funds from payments that could be made to Mrs. Dargan. 23 24 11. Accordingly, the parties jointly request that the Court enter an order directing them to engage in pro bono mediation. 25 26 STIPULATION REQUESTING MEDIATION - 2 {03263897.DOCX;1 } CAIRNCROSS & HEMPELMANN, P.S. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 524 Second Avenue, Suite 500 Seattle, Washington 98104-2323 office 206 587 0700 fax 206 587 2308 1 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this __ day of February, 2017. 2 CAIRNCROSS & HEMPELMANN, P.S. 3 4 /s/ Lindsey M. Pflugrath Lindsey M. Pflugrath, WSBA No. 36964 E-mail: lpflugrath@cairncross.com 524 Second Avenue, Suite 500 Seattle, WA 98104-2323 Telephone: (206) 587-0700 Facsimile: (206) 587-2308 Attorneys for Plaintiff 5 6 7 8 9 10 AGREED TO BY: 11 MARGARET E. DARGAN GARY V. INGRAM 13 _______________________________ ____________________________________ 14 Date:___________________________ Date:_______________________________ 12 15 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED: 18 DATED: February 16, 2017. 19 20 A Robert S. Lasnik 21 United States District Judge  22 23 24 25 26 STIPULATION REQUESTING MEDIATION - 3 {03263897.DOCX;1 } CAIRNCROSS & HEMPELMANN, P.S. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 524 Second Avenue, Suite 500 Seattle, Washington 98104-2323 office 206 587 0700 fax 206 587 2308

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?