Dargan v. Nodus
Filing
99
STIPULATION AND ORDER to Extend Temporary Restraining Order; re parties' 97 Stipulated Motion, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT)
1
Honorable Robert S. Lasnik
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
MARGARET E. DARGAN, a single person
and resident of the state of Oregon,
Plaintiff,
v.
NO. 2:08-cv-01714-RSL
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND TEMPORARY
RESTRAINING ORDER
GARY V. INGRAM, a Washington resident,
individually; PAMELA M. NODUS, a
Washington resident, individually; and the
marital community of GARY V. INGRAM and
PAMELA M. NODUS,
Defendants.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
On June 22, 2017 at 3:20 p.m., the Court entered a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO)
(Dkt. 96) restraining Defendants Gary Ingram and Pamela Nodus from transferring funds out of
ten (10) identified accounts and any other undisclosed accounts and ordering Chase Bank, Wells
Fargo Bank and U.S. Bank to freeze the identified accounts. The TRO was based in part on the
Declaration of Robert Agnew (Dkt. 95), an investigator who conducted a search which resulted
in identification of the ten (10) accounts frozen by the TRO. The TRO further provided:
This Order shall remain in place for 14 days from the date of filing. Defendants
shall have until July 3, 2017, to file an opposition seeking to dissolve or modify
the restraints imposed by this Order. If no opposition is filed, the motion will be
converted to a preliminary injunction. If an opposition is filed, plaintiff may file a
reply by noon on July 6, 2017.
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER- 1
(2:08-cv-01714-RSL)
BAROKAS MARTIN & TOMLINSON
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1422 BELLEVUE AVENUE
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122
TELEPHONE (206) 621-1871
FAX (206) 621-9907
1
For Defendant Ingram to adequately oppose the TRO and verify ownership of the
2
accounts in question requires obtaining documentation from U.S. Bank, Wells Fargo and Chase
3
Bank via subpoenas duces tecum. Defendant Ingram is immediately issuing said subpoenas for
4
service, but it is unlikely that the necessary bank records will be produced prior to Defendant
5
Ingram’s opposition deadline of July 3, 2017.
6
Therefore, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b)(2), Defendant Ingram consents to and
7
requests that the TRO be extended by an additional fourteen (14) days; that the opposition
8
deadline be extended to July 17, 2017; and that plaintiff’s reply deadline be extended to noon on
9
July 20, 2017. Plaintiff agrees and stipulates to the entry of such an order.
10
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 27th day of June, 2017.
11
12
BAROKAS MARTIN & TOMLINSON
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
By: /s/ Abigail Z. Staggers
Abigail Z. Staggers, WSBA #43962
Attorneys for Defendant, Gary V. Ingram
1422 Bellevue Avenue
Seattle, WA 98122
Phone: 206-621-1871
Fax: 206-21-9907
Email: azs@bmatlaw.com
CAIRNCROSS & HEMPELMANN, P.S.
By: /s/ Lindsey M. Pflugrath
Lindsey M. Pflugrath, WSBA #36964
Attorneys for Plaintiff, Margaret E. Dargan
524 Second Avenue, Suite 500
Seattle, WA 98104
Phone: 206-587-0700
Fax: 206-587-2308
Email: lpflugrath@cairncross.com
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER- 2
(2:08-cv-01714-RSL)
BAROKAS MARTIN & TOMLINSON
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1422 BELLEVUE AVENUE
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122
TELEPHONE (206) 621-1871
FAX (206) 621-9907
1
2
3
4
ORDER
The parties having so stipulated and agreed, it is hereby SO ORDERED. The Clerk is
directed to send copies of this Order to all counsel of record.
Dated this 28th day of June, 2017.
5
ALasnik
Honorable Robert S.
6
United States District Court Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER- 3
(2:08-cv-01714-RSL)
BAROKAS MARTIN & TOMLINSON
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1422 BELLEVUE AVENUE
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122
TELEPHONE (206) 621-1871
FAX (206) 621-9907
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?