Greenpoint Technologies, Inc v. Peridot Associated S.A. et al

Filing 40

ORDER denying pltf's 38 Motion for Reconsideration, by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(VP)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

GREENPOINT TECHNOLIGIES, INC. Plaintiff, v. PERIDOT ASSOCIATED S.A., et al., Defendants.

) ) CASE NO. C08-1828 RSM ) ) ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S ) MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION ) ) ) ) )

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. (Dkt. #38). Such motions are disfavored and will be denied in the absence of "a showing of manifest error in the prior ruling or a showing of new facts or legal authority which could not have been brought to its attention earlier with reasonable diligence." Local Rule CR 7(h)(1). Here, Plaintiff argues that the Court should clarify its order vacating a prejudgment writ of garnishment to ensure that Defendants do not sell or transfer an aircraft that is the subject of the parties' dispute. Alternatively, Plaintiff argues that the Court should reinstate the writ for 30 days. The legal basis for Plaintiff's motion rests upon its contention that a Ninth Circuit case relied upon by the Court in the previous order is not controlling in this case. However,

ORDER PAGE - 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Plaint iff's current motion essentially amounts to re-argument of issues presented earlier. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion shall be DENIED.

The Clerk is directed to forward a copy of this Order to all counsel of record.

DATED this 25th day of March, 2009.

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER PAGE - 2