Wilson v. Seattle Housing Authority et al

Filing 46

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 44 Motion to Stay 42 MOTION to Dismiss: the Motion to Dismiss is re-noted to 2/19/2010; signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman.(SC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 v. SEATTLE HOUSING AUTHORITY, and THOMAS TIERNEY, Executive Director of the Seattle Housing Authority, in his Official Capacity, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, and SHAUN DONOVAN, secretary for the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, in his official capacity Defendants. THE HONORABLE MARSHA J. PECHMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE MARKELETTA WILSON, MARIE TOWNES, and all other similarly situated individuals, Plaintiffs, NO. 09-CV-00226-MJP ORDER ON AGREED MOTION RE: HUD DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS Note for Hearing: December 4, 2009 The above-entitled Court, having reviewed the parties' Agreed Motion to Stay Proceedings Related to HUD Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, makes the following ruling: ORDER re: AGREED MOT. TO STAY HUD DEFS' MOT. TO DISMISS (09-CV-00226-MJP) - 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 IT IS ORDERED THAT: The HUD Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is re-noted to February 19, 2010, to allow time for all parties to either: (1) agree to permit discovery related to the Motion to Dismiss and set a proposed discovery schedule; or (2) create a proposed briefing schedule for the Court to decide whether discovery should be permitted on the Motion to Dismiss. The clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to all counsel of record. Dated: December 11, 2009 Marsha J. Pechman United States District Judge A ORDER re: AGREED MOT. TO STAY HUD DEFS' MOT. TO DISMISS (09-CV-00226-MJP) - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?