Experience Hendrix LLC et al v. HendrixLicensing.com Ltd et al
MINUTE ORDER denying Plaintiffs' 215 Motion for Entry of Judgment. The Court declines to enter the form of judgment, docket no. 215-1, submitted with plaintiffs' motion. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
EXPERIENCE HENDRIX, L.L.C.,
The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable
Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge:
Plaintiffs’ motion for entry of judgment, docket no. 215, is treated as a
motion to reopen this case and is DENIED without prejudice. Pursuant to the parties’
Settlement Agreement, in the event of defendant Andrew Pitsicalis’s default in timely
making payments, plaintiffs are authorized to seek entry of a stipulated final judgment in
the form attached as Exhibit B to the Settlement Agreement, which sets forth as the
judgment amount “five hundred fifty thousand dollars ($550,000), less the amount of any
principal payments that have already been paid.” See Ex. B to Ex. A to Stickney Decl.
(docket no. 216-1). Plaintiffs move for entry of a judgment in the amount of $505,000,
based on their assertion that defendants have paid only $49,500, and not $67,500, as
indicated by defendants, see Pitsicalis Decl. (docket no. 218). The Court declines to enter
the form of judgment, docket no. 215-1, submitted with plaintiffs’ motion.
In connection with their motion, plaintiffs filed as Exhibit C to the
21 Declaration of Scott M. Stickney, docket no. 216-3, copies of various checks made
payable to Experience Hendrix LLC, drawn on accounts held by defendants or related
22 entities or by their attorney. Such exhibit was not appropriately redacted pursuant to
MINUTE ORDER - 1
1 Local Civil Rule 5.2(a)(4), and upon discovering counsel’s filing error, the Court sealed
the exhibit. The parties are advised that, during the interim, the exhibit might have been
2 uploaded by private websites unrelated to and outside the control of the Court, and might
now be available to the public for a fee. See www.pacermonitor.com; www.law360.com.
3 Defendants and their counsel are encouraged to take appropriate steps to secure their
bank accounts. Plaintiffs’ counsel is reminded of his obligation to treat financial account
4 numbers and other personal data identifiers with utmost care to avoid the risk of identity
theft and misappropriation of funds.
The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of
Dated this 14th day of June, 2017.
William M. McCool
MINUTE ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?