Northwest Administrators, Inc. v. Fred Hill Materials, Inc.

Filing 16

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Hon. Mary Alice Theiler. Plaintiff's motion 9 for summary judgment is hereby GRANTED and plaintiff awarded a total of $13,323.30 in delinquent contributions for December 2008 and for February through March 2009. Plaintiff is also entitled to liquidated damages, interest, attorneys fees, and costs, as outlined above. However, because plaintiff calculated the amounts described above as of May 13, 2009, a revised accounting may now be in order. Accordingly, plaintiff shall submit such information within ten (10) days of the date. (KL)

Download PDF
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE CASE NO. C09-0366-MAT 09 NORTHWEST ADMINISTRATORS, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, 10 ) ) v. 11 ) ) 12 FRED HILL MATERIALS, INC., ) ) Defendant. 13 ) ____________________________________ ) 14 15 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiff Northwest Administrators, Inc. moves the Court for summary judgment 16 against defendant Fred Hill Materials, Inc. (Dkts. 9 & 10.) This matter was brought pursuant 17 to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. ("ERISA"). 18 Defendant is bound by a collective bargaining agreement with Local 589 of the International 19 Brotherhood of Teamsters, which requires defendant to pay monthly contributions to the 20 Retirees Welfare Trust Fund (hereinafter "Trust") for eligible employees. (See Dkt. 11, Ex. 21 A.) Defendant also signed an Agreement and Declaration of Trust containing terms as to 22 damages owed as a result of any delinquent contributions, as well as attorneys' fees and costs. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PAGE -1 01 (Id., Ex. B.) Plaintiff is the authorized administrative agent for and assignee of the Trust and 02 seeks delinquent contributions to the Trust, as well as associated damages, attorneys' fees, and 03 costs for December 2008 and for February through March 2009. Plaintiff attaches remittance 04 reports from defendant for the months in question and a spreadsheet showing the amounts of 05 contributions owed, their due dates, and calculations of liquidated damages, interest, attorneys' 06 fees, and costs. (Id., Exs. C & D.) 07 In its answer to plaintiff's complaint, defendant acknowledged that it was a party to the 08 above-described agreements, admitted that it failed to report for and pay some, but not all, of 09 the relief requested, admitted that its records contained detailed information necessary to 10 determine the extent of its unpaid allegations to plaintiff, but otherwise denied plaintiff's 11 allegations. (Dkt. 6.) Defendant did not oppose plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. 12 The Court deems defendant's failure to oppose to be an admission that plaintiff's motion has 13 merit. See Local Civil Rule 7(b)(2). The Court also, for the reasons described below, finds 14 plaintiff entitled to summary judgment. 15 Summary judgment is appropriate when "the pleadings, depositions, answers to 16 interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no 17 genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a 18 matter of law." Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c); Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986). 19 The moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law when the nonmoving party fails to 20 make a sufficient showing on an essential element of his case with respect to which he has the 21 burden of proof. See Celotex, 477 U.S. at 322-23. 22 ERISA obligates participating employers to make contributions to a multi-employer ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PAGE -2 01 trust fund in accordance with the contract and trust agreement. See ERISA Section 515, 29 02 U.S.C. § 1145. ERISA also provides specific mandatory remedies for delinquent 03 contributions, including, in addition to the unpaid contributions, liquidated damages, interest, 04 attorney's fees, and costs. See 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(2). As noted, defendant also signed an 05 Agreement and Declaration of Trust containing terms as to damages owed as a result of 06 delinquent contributions. 07 In this case, using defendant's remittance reports, plaintiff calculates total contributions 08 owed in the amount of $13,323.30 for the period of December 2008 through March 2009. (See 09 Dkt. 11, ¶ 11 and Exs. C & D.) Plaintiff further calculates that defendant is obligated to pay 10 liquidated damages in the amount of $3,562.86, pre-judgment interest, through May 13, 2009, 11 in the amount of $387.41, $791.88 in attorneys' fees, and $455.10 in costs. (Id., ¶ 13 and Exs. 12 C & D; Dkt. 12, ¶¶ 2, 5 and Ex. A.) 13 The Court finds no issues of fact regarding either the enforceability of the collective 14 bargaining and trust agreements at issue in this case or plaintiff's entitlement to the total amount 15 of delinquent contributions, liquidated damages, interest, attorneys' fees, and costs sought. 16 Accordingly, the Court finds summary judgment appropriate. 17 For the reasons described above, plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is hereby 18 GRANTED and plaintiff awarded a total of $13,323.30 in delinquent contributions for 19 December 2008 and for February through March 2009. Plaintiff is also entitled to liquidated 20 damages, interest, attorneys' fees, and costs, as outlined above. However, because plaintiff 21 calculated the amounts described above as of May 13, 2009, a revised accounting may now be 22 in order. Accordingly, plaintiff shall submit such information within ten (10) days of the date ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PAGE -3 01 of this Order. 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 s/ Mary Alice Theiler United States Magistrate Judge DATED this 9th day of July, 2009. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PAGE -4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?